Please demonstrate why my observations of nature, my experiments, my evaluations and my predictions of what nature will reveal, are not science
You ca measure, evaluate and predict all you want. But as Ken Ham states,
But notice something about the assumptions of naturalism and uniformitarianism: they are anti-biblical assumptions. The bible indicated that the universe was created supernaturally by God (Genesis 1:1) and that present rates are not always indicitive of past rates.
So measure all you want, and evaluate all you want. I don't see how, by this very statement alone, can you use any of these measurements or evaluations to explain what happened in the past. As by assuming, just that present rates are not always indicitive of past rates, that any measurement, and any evaluation you make based of that measurement, will hold for anything in the past.
™ Version 4.2