Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does ID follow the scientific method?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 226 of 325 (592786)
11-22-2010 12:27 AM
Reply to: Message 223 by marc9000
11-21-2010 7:41 PM


Are marc's copious scientific errors on topic? I hope so.
. Life on earth exists in a very narrow temperature range.
Life on Earth inhabits a considerably broad temperature range, from psychrophyllic bacteria such as you might find leaving black sludge all over the inside of an ice machine, to the hyperthermophiles found at sea floor vents as hot as 121 degrees Celsius.
Dead partially developed systems do not continue to evolve.
Indeed. Evolution could not proceed without death.
And of course living organisms do not individually evolve, either. Evolution is something that happens to populations, it's not a process where a single individual becomes a fish, then a lizard, then a monkey.
Explorations of specificity between components, or continuous/discontinuous as he describes, follow the scientific method.
Such explorations have never followed the scientific method.
. I only touched on it here to highlight the obvious — questions and challenges to any theory are likely to be more involved when they come from those who are most interested in challenging it.
And yet the discoveries you refer to were made by conventional biologists, operating under evolutionary assumptions. ID "researchers" did not make the discoveries.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by marc9000, posted 11-21-2010 7:41 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024