The Great Creationist Fossil Failure

I couldn't, either. It's neither here nor there.Soft bodied?Those non-soft bodied small shelly fossils existed before the Cambrian Explosion. Creationists don't like mentioning those.PALAEONTOLOGY[online] | Article: Fossil Focus > Fossil Focus: The place of small shelly fossils in the Cambrian explosion, and the origin of Animals

So, nothing about those fossils yet?

Not just fossils. All the other evidence. too. However, sparse fossils also do provide excellent evidence for evolution. All those intermerdiate fossils we have found do it just fine. That doesnt make any sense at all. You do know that the oldest fossils are prokaryotes, don't you? You also do realise that fish don't appear out of thin air? Lots and lots and lots of intermediates. Nothing was poofed into existence. Now you're talking nonsense. We have fossils of thousands of intermediates.Against that, we don't even have one example of anything being poofed into existence. Ah great, creation week happened over millions of years. Everyting poofed into existence except for for sponges (Precambrian), cnidarians (Precambrian), bryozoans (Ordovicium), fishes (Silurian), non-avian reptiles (Devonian), first insects (Devonian), first amphibians (Devonian), mammals (Triassic), birds (Jurassic).No vertebrates, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds or mammals were poofed into existence during that "Cambrian creation week". Just lots of things "created" many, many weeks (read hundreds of millions of years) earlier or later.You don't make any sense, mindspawn.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This one is funny. mindspawn doesn't realise that the difficulty in placing fossils as being either human-apes or non-human apes actually is excellent evidence for human evolution?I'll use a creationist word. Proved.mindspawn 'proved' that we have intermediates between non-human apes and human apes as they can't easily be classified as modern apes or modern humans. Those are somewhere inbetween. mindspawn unknowingly 'proved' human evolution to all of us.

Ah great. Could you direct us to the research you've done on those fossils you excavated and also where you published that researchin some peer-reviewed scientific journal?Let's just give you a little hint. Reading stuff on fossils on some creationist website is not research. Quoting what someone said is not research in the natural sciences.Provide your data.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

The diffence is that evolutionary theory can explain those differences scientifically. Poofing things into existence can't.

Really? Who said that? Creationists? I think that you're not telling the truth here.Humans have unique genes. So do Chimps. So do Swedish Elk. So do some Amoebas.Some of those organisms have more genes than humans do.Have you been reading too much creationist propaganda instead of scientific sources? Have you been told lies you believe without checking the original sources?mindspawn, YEC's always tell untruths. That's all they have.He-he-he. As a side note, could you provide me with the difference in number of 'unique coding genes' between, say, modern humans and Chimps? That would be interesting to hear the answer from you. How do you measure the number of 'unique coding genes'?Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

mindspawn also ignored the fact that humans have fewer genes than Chimps...

That's fine for you, mindspawn. Yet, you're talking nonsense.You're a bit loony, mindspawn, but not all people are as loony as you are. Life is changing. Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

Please do also include a photo of a hipo. They actually mostly tend to have to eat on the banks of the rivers and lakes at night. Sleep in the water during the day with their nostrils surfacing. To me they are majestic mammals.

Please don't tell untruths. You telling untruths really reflects badly on some religious people.

Sure. Trilobites evolved from 'primative morphology' to 'modern morphology' until they died out (300 million years after their first appearance). More than 20 000 species of trilobites that diverged from the primative 'states' have been described from fossils.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

Are those Manatees or Dugongs? Filthy mammals, anyway. Hipos are cuter.Oh, and hipos have more genetic information than manatees.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

And ignores all those multiple non-marine coastal transgressions and regressions.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This one was just as funny. Yeah, I always wondered how exactly flowering plants chose to be outrunning the ferns in going for the hills.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.