Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bible Question: What was the First Sin?
Mikael Fivel
Member (Idle past 6118 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 03-23-2007


Message 121 of 312 (391139)
03-23-2007 5:07 PM


things to note:
"For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). sin causes seperation from God
ROMANS 6
19I put this in human terms because you are weak in your natural selves. Just as you used to offer the parts of your body in slavery to impurity and to ever-increasing wickedness, so now offer them in slavery to righteousness leading to holiness. 20When you were slaves to sin, you were free from the control of righteousness. 21What benefit did you reap at that time from the things you are now ashamed of? Those things result in death! 22But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves to God, the benefit you reap leads to holiness, and the result is eternal life. 23For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in[b] Christ Jesus our Lord.
we all know that we all die physically. the death that is stated in the bible many times, is never designated. so to point that it is only physical would be wrong. but pointing the possibility of that is merely judgment. look at it this way. we obviously know that adam and eve did not drop dead the second they ate the fruit, and we know that there are two types of death (which coincidentally are not always distinguished in the bible), so if they didn't drop dead, and God said you shall DIE, he's pointing at Spiritual death (based on the seperation from God that sin causes).
1)it's quite simple to understand once you know that:
2)all beings and entities die, and
3)following the path of righteousness leads to eternal LIFE.
the opposite of LIFE is DEATH.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by Mikael Fivel, : didnt' mean to hit submit.
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by Coragyps, posted 03-23-2007 5:14 PM Mikael Fivel has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 122 of 312 (391140)
03-23-2007 5:07 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Mikael Fivel
03-23-2007 4:48 PM


Hello, Mikael, and welcome!
her converstion with the serpent clearly states that she KNEW that God told her NOT to touch OR eat of the fruit.
You are mistaken: Eve is not reported to have ever had that conversation with God. Adam did before his "helpmeet" was even created. And, additionally, if you "have no knowledge of good and evil" how do you know whether to trust a man-like creature more than a walking snake?
Gen 2:15 The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16 And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."
18 The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-23-2007 4:48 PM Mikael Fivel has not replied

Mikael Fivel
Member (Idle past 6118 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 03-23-2007


Message 123 of 312 (391143)
03-23-2007 5:13 PM


what i meant by GOD TOLD HER... was that she was informed that God had stated... and that changes nothing. she knew.
if my wife calls my boss, and my boss tells me that she wants me to grab dinner on the way home, SHE TOLD ME TO, he informed me. the command came from her, through my boss to me.
Edited by Mikael Fivel, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by purpledawn, posted 03-25-2007 8:09 AM Mikael Fivel has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 124 of 312 (391144)
03-23-2007 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Mikael Fivel
03-23-2007 5:07 PM


and we know that there are two types of death
Who is this "we" that know that? I'm aware of people ceasing to breathe, their hearts stopping, and the voltages between their synapses going to zero, but not of other kinds of death other than purely poetic.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by Coragyps, : bad speler
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-23-2007 5:07 PM Mikael Fivel has not replied

Mikael Fivel
Member (Idle past 6118 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 03-23-2007


Message 125 of 312 (391146)
03-23-2007 5:17 PM


those who read this:
ephesians 4
18They are darkened in their understanding and separated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them due to the hardening of their hearts.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

Mikael Fivel
Member (Idle past 6118 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 03-23-2007


Message 126 of 312 (391147)
03-23-2007 5:18 PM


and the death we're talking about is IN SIN...
colossians 2
13When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature,[a] God made you[b] alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins,
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Coragyps, posted 03-23-2007 5:29 PM Mikael Fivel has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 127 of 312 (391150)
03-23-2007 5:29 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Mikael Fivel
03-23-2007 5:18 PM


I can quote the Bible, too, y'know:
Numbers 31:17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
Your belief that the book has some special meaning makes little impression on me.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-23-2007 5:18 PM Mikael Fivel has not replied

Mikael Fivel
Member (Idle past 6118 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 03-23-2007


Message 128 of 312 (391151)
03-23-2007 5:34 PM


and that reply does not belong on this thread, in fact, it has nothing to do with it. and you're quoting a passage that includes a command that was given as an order to SOMEONE else to RETAIN purity within a nation because a plague fell on the people... not all of us.
it doesn't matter what your or my belief is. this forum is arguin biblical text, and you should strive to find BIBLICAL answers.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by Mikael Fivel, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Coragyps, posted 03-23-2007 5:50 PM Mikael Fivel has replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 129 of 312 (391156)
03-23-2007 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Mikael Fivel
03-23-2007 5:34 PM


And you, Mikael, are quoting passages written at least 800 years after the one you are tring to explain, and written by a person from an hugely altered cultural setting. The guys that wrote Genesis or Leviticus did not see religion in the same way the various guys who get called "Paul" did. (Nor did the various "Pauls," for that matter.)
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
Take comments to the Moderation Thread.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-23-2007 5:34 PM Mikael Fivel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-23-2007 5:57 PM Coragyps has not replied

Mikael Fivel
Member (Idle past 6118 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 03-23-2007


Message 130 of 312 (391159)
03-23-2007 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Coragyps
03-23-2007 5:50 PM


right but that doesn't change anything. in fact, the first four books of the bible are books of the old law of moses. paul wasn't even a part of the bible until the first century. he was (and you might know this) acutally a fundementalist christian HATER, he stoned christians, hated and persecuted them. his words also identify with people much more differently than God's.
adam and eve didn't need to know that there was a spiritual death or a physical death. all they knew was basic. "you can have anything of these trees and bushes, JUST NOT THE ONE IN THE MIDDLE", easy to identify with them, wasn't it? God never created man perfect, in fact, all that is stated is "Very Good".
Edited by Mikael Fivel, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Coragyps, posted 03-23-2007 5:50 PM Coragyps has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by AdminPhat, posted 03-24-2007 6:21 AM Mikael Fivel has replied
 Message 132 by jar, posted 03-24-2007 11:30 AM Mikael Fivel has replied

AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 131 of 312 (391265)
03-24-2007 6:21 AM
Reply to: Message 130 by Mikael Fivel
03-23-2007 5:57 PM


Lets keep within guidelines
Mikael, lets slow down a moment. I want you to be aware of the Forum Guidelines. Forums such as this one are not mere online verbal jousting arenas where we show up and anonymously encounter other strangers with which we lock horns in skirmishes and wars of words.
Ideally, at EvC, we strive to listen more and attempt to get to know each other a bit and present our arguments in a clear and concise manner.
When engaging in a debate, keep in mind what the original topic is about and present your points one at a time related to the original topic.
Welcome to EvC, by the way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-23-2007 5:57 PM Mikael Fivel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-25-2007 5:23 AM AdminPhat has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 423 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 132 of 312 (391289)
03-24-2007 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 130 by Mikael Fivel
03-23-2007 5:57 PM


Paul is still way off topic.
And even if Paul were on topic, it is perfectly reasonable to look and see if his words can be supported. Often they cannot.
Why should Adam and Eve know they should listen to one authority figure over another or even what obey meant?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-23-2007 5:57 PM Mikael Fivel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-25-2007 5:21 AM jar has replied

Mikael Fivel
Member (Idle past 6118 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 03-23-2007


Message 133 of 312 (391459)
03-25-2007 5:21 AM
Reply to: Message 132 by jar
03-24-2007 11:30 AM


Re: Paul is still way off topic.
The serpent never stated himself as an authority figure.
and even if you don't know the definition of the word OBEY, it's still clear that when you're told NOT to do something, don't do it. God was the only one handing out orders, the serpent merely deceived eve.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by jar, posted 03-24-2007 11:30 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by jar, posted 03-25-2007 8:54 AM Mikael Fivel has not replied
 Message 137 by ringo, posted 03-25-2007 12:00 PM Mikael Fivel has replied

Mikael Fivel
Member (Idle past 6118 days)
Posts: 70
Joined: 03-23-2007


Message 134 of 312 (391460)
03-25-2007 5:23 AM
Reply to: Message 131 by AdminPhat
03-24-2007 6:21 AM


Re: Lets keep within guidelines
i was never trying to change the subject, and honestly i don't know why you seem to be pinning that one me. i was trying to make sure that the thread stayed on topic, and i also followed up on the tangent brought to attention.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by AdminPhat, posted 03-24-2007 6:21 AM AdminPhat has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 135 of 312 (391472)
03-25-2007 8:09 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by Mikael Fivel
03-23-2007 5:13 PM


Obey or Reason
It seems Adam didn't quite pass on the message word for word.
Genesis 3:3 (Eve Speaking)
...but from the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, 'You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die.' "
Genesis 2:17 (God Speaking)
...but from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat from it you will surely die."
But since sin is going against God's commands, I agree that the first sin was Eve eating the apple.
In Message 12 the originator presents:
The first sin was when Eve lied to the serpent. God had said nothing about touching the tree, so she lied.
But I contend that God had not commanded them not to lie or make a rule stricter (Like putting a fence around the Torah), plus as I said earlier Adam may have added the Do Not Touch portion when he passed on the command. We really don't know.
Going strictly by the text, Eve's nibble was first.

Why does someone believe you when you say there are four billion stars, but check when you say the paint is wet?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Mikael Fivel, posted 03-23-2007 5:13 PM Mikael Fivel has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024