Did the Flood really happen?

Nobody in the entire world agrees with you. Answers in Genesis, one of the best known YEC organizations, disagrees with you; I posted their definition.Post a quote from someone who agrees with you.Of course you can't, because nobody agrees with you.

Yes, just as different layers in the geologic column are part of the same stack.If, analogous to the case of the geologic column, the stack is defined as all the stacks in the room...

I disagree. Depends on how the "same stack" is defined. The geologic column is defined as underlying every point on the Earth. In this analogy, the stack would be defined as every pile of coins in the room.

Repeating your claims is not explaining. Explaianing would be saying why you think thata, and presenting reeal-world evidence and reasoning.You can't do that. How do you know they are not? But that's irrelevant.The column is not defined by its contents, it's defined by its location. Under every point on Earth.

In all cases you just repeat it. Obviously you don't want to communicate, your goal is obfuscation. The geological column is not defined ass you claim, period, end of story, 30, that's all folks.If you insist on your definition, please never say anything bout the geologic column in the future. That's just impeding communication.

That's one of your claims. Repeating your claims is not evidence for your claims. That's one of your claims. Repeating your claims is not evidence for your claims. Gratuitous insult noted. That isn't evidence for your cliams either.

And true, and in agreement with every definition I could find. No point unless you can produce some evidence your definition is valid. Quote someone who agrees with you. Find a definition from some reasonable authority that agrees with you.

It's your analogy.That's yet another repetition of one of your claims. Your claims are not evidence for your claims. That's a slightly new version of one of your claims. Your claims are not evidence for your claims.

And everyone else.All you are doing is blocking accurate communication.

Gulf of Mexico is ocean. ABE Wikipedia: "The Gulf of Mexico (Spanish: Golfo de Mxico) is an ocean basin and a marginal sea of the Atlantic Ocean, largely surrounded by the North American continent. It is bounded on the northeast, north and northwest by the Gulf Coast of the United States, on the southwest and south by Mexico, and on the southeast by Cuba."ABE here's a map showing the continental shelf and the deep ocean Exactly what are the signs of it "having been formed after all the strata were laid down, and that would include the strata of the Cretaceous with its iridium layer"? Why do you think that iridium layer was laid down after the rest of the world's iridium layer?Time to repost... see my next message Edited by JonF, : No reason given.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

The geologic column underlies every point on Earth, including the oceans. Message 770:
You seem to think that the geologic column appears only in "very definite locations". No, the geologic column is defined as:

quote:

---

1. a columnar diagram that shows the rock formations of a locality or region and that is arranged to indicate their relations to the subdivisions of geologic time.
2 : the sequence of rock formations in a geologic column.

---

(Merriam-Webster, note "a locality or region")

quote:

---

The geological column is the theoretical classification system for the layers of rocks and fossils that make up the Earth's crust (also known as the standard geologic column). Fossiliferous layers can often be traced across entire continents and correlated with rocks in other countries.

---

(CreationWiki.com, note "crust" )

quote:

---

The geologic system is a conceptual arrangement of rock formations around the world meshed together into a single, unbroken record of Earth's past.[1] It is also known as the geologic column or geologic timescale.

---

(Conservapedia, note" around the world "lDid you notice that none of those definitions restrict the location of the geologic column in any way? Every point on the crust (which encompasses all the parts that are above the mantle, including sea floors is the top of "the" geologic column. Really it's the local portion of a world-wide geologic column. The interior layers of the crust vary widely from place to place. But we can tell from context that "geologic column" really means "local geologic column.When sediment accumulates on the ocean floor, it's accumulating on top of the (local} geologic column, and adding to it. Message 789:Drop a grain of sand anywhere on earth, including the oceans, and wherever it lands it is on top of the geologic column.Off Greenland: Mediterranean Sea: Norwegian Sea: If you want to speak only of layers on land, you need to use a different term..

We know water. We know gravity. We know erosion. We know the chemistry of lithification. We know Walther's Law. We know floods. We know lots.Flood size is irrelevant after some point, because the effects are always local.We know.

Thus spake Faith.Define "sea floor" and demonstrate why the Gulf of Mexico isn't it. .Note that significant layers are accumulating on top of a part of the geologic column in the Gulf. That's the point which you are desperately trying to avoid.Also address the cores I posted Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

Thus spake Faith.Floods don't produce layers, and flumes are irrelevant. Floods do not sort fossils or anything.You're saying all life would be destroyed before layers accumulated. So the first layer and each subsequent layer would overly all the fossils.Is that what we see?

This isn't a game show. It's your claim, you defend it.My money is on unthinking knee-jerk reaction in a vain attempt to avoid having to address the issue.