Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 56 (9170 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Neptune7
Post Volume: Total: 917,367 Year: 4,624/9,624 Month: 399/1,096 Week: 104/119 Day: 0/4 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   When Will The End-Times Be And How Will We Know?
Member (Idle past 101 days)
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004

Message 418 of 794 (878359)
06-29-2020 12:47 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by Phat
06-21-2020 9:23 AM

Re: Burden Of Proof 101
Phat writes:
At this point, my gut level reaction was that if I can falsify my assurance that something is most definitely true, I have weakened my certainty of faith!
Just for clarification:
It will not weaken the certainty of your faith.
The actual veracity of your faith is as it always was - unknown.
It may, however, weaken your perception of your certainty of your faith.
And, it's a personal question that only you can answer:
Does Phat want "certainty of faith!" regardless of the actual veracity of that faith?
(Prioritize personally feeling good - regardless of reality's truth)
Does Phat want "certainty of faith!" in things that are, actually, likely to be true?
(Prioritize reality's truth - regardless of personal feelings on the matter)
For certain things, it is an easy pick.
One will always prefer "reality's truth" over "personal feelings on the matter" when deciding whether or not to look both ways before crossing the street.
For other things, it is not easy, and it is a personal decision which is best.
Sometimes, "feeling good" can (and should) be prioritized over reality's truth. (Usually when "feeling good" gets blurred in with "reality's truth")
For example: Someone choosing to deny/ignore/refuse-to-accept-credibility of certain historical events in their past in order to be happy in the present.
Like a rape victim choosing not to focus on the event because it is too painful and debilitating to even attempt to heal through therapy.
It's up to you to choose which is best for you in which situations.
And, of course, up to the rest of us to do the same ourselves.
When the two path's cross - it can be difficult to "hide one's aversion to reality's truth" when discussing with someone else who prioritizes "discovering reality's truth regardless of personal feelings" on any particular matter.
Best practice is to be able to identify which one you're doing.
-when you want to avoid reality; then avoid situations where others want to investigate reality.
-when you want to investigate reality; avoid actively seeking out people-minding-their-own-business and forcing them to listen to you.
It's the only way everyone can do what they want with their personal lives without affecting others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Phat, posted 06-21-2020 9:23 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

Member (Idle past 101 days)
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004

Message 773 of 794 (897817)
09-12-2022 4:30 PM
Reply to: Message 772 by PaulK
09-12-2022 2:07 PM

PaulK writes:
Daniel 8 tells us that the End Times will be in the latter days of the Diadochi kingdoms. Battle of Actium, 31 BC and that’s IT.
Heh... I never knew there were two end-times predictions in the Bible, I thought it was just the one ringo mentioned.
Are there more than 2?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 772 by PaulK, posted 09-12-2022 2:07 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 774 by PaulK, posted 09-13-2022 12:17 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024