Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (9006 total)
48 online now:
kjsimons, ramoss, ringo (3 members, 45 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,301 Year: 13,049/23,288 Month: 774/1,527 Week: 75/138 Day: 24/24 Hour: 0/0

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Your First Ever EVC Post
Member (Idle past 2824 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Message 25 of 140 (529885)
10-10-2009 10:14 PM

This was my first post itwas in the topic
The scientific method is based on a logical fallacy
on 10-06-2007 11:06 PM

The point is why scientific evidences are referred to as theories, since there is a possibility or possibilities that other factors may occur to change the possible outcome. This defines science and states the reason why there is a constant attempt to find the correct answer to any proposed hypothesis and even when accepted there will still be attempts to refine the theory.

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Add link.

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Fix typo (I thought I hit "preview").

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020