Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 4/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abortion questions...?
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 241 of 403 (602502)
01-28-2011 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 235 by slevesque
01-28-2011 4:14 PM


Re: Evidence?
I'm giving you the freakin' definition of the word. You're not humpty-dumpty and words don't mean what you want them to mean. Sorry to burst everyone's bubble here, but there is nothing pejorative about calling someone pro-abortion.
Actually, the terms pro-life and pro-choice are classic examples of Humpty-Dumpty definitions. I'll give the folk marketing the anti-abortion, pro-forced parenthood, pro-rape parenthood, pro-incest parenthood, pro illicit abortion, pro uncontrolled abortion position lots of credit for choosing the moniker "pro-life".
But the fact is that they did just decide what the words would mean.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 4:14 PM slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 244 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 4:49 PM jar has replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4671 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 242 of 403 (602503)
01-28-2011 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 237 by ringo
01-28-2011 4:17 PM


Re: Evidence?
You're a part of society. Your approach is part of the problem. You're one of those who is failing to provide the resources.
You do realize that quebec is the most taxed part of north america ? You do realize my father gives 55% of his salary to the government ?
I am the one paying for abortions here in quebec. I am the one paying for the late abortions we send over in Kansas. I am the one paying for everything in the medical system.
And if the government decided to give more ressources to woman who wanted to keep their babies, I would be the one paying for it.
Maybe your Christian community needs to focus some of its efforts closer to home. Instead of complaining about the choices that women make, maybe you need to make the alternatives more attractive.
As I said earlier in this thread, we do both. We support financially a home for woman who decided to have the child.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 237 by ringo, posted 01-28-2011 4:17 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 246 by ringo, posted 01-28-2011 5:02 PM slevesque has not replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4671 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 243 of 403 (602508)
01-28-2011 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 239 by ringo
01-28-2011 4:27 PM


Re: Evidence?
Sorry for being rude, but when, in a sentence, I want to refer to the collection of persons who are for legalized abortion, it is perfectly legitimate that I use the appropriate word for this.
There is certainly a difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion, and when the nuance is needed in one way or another, I just use the appropriate word. But in most situations, both words can be used and in those cases I am free to use whichever one. Although I guess, seeing as it offends everyone, I could use pro-choice in those situations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by ringo, posted 01-28-2011 4:27 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 245 by hooah212002, posted 01-28-2011 4:59 PM slevesque has replied
 Message 248 by ringo, posted 01-28-2011 5:05 PM slevesque has replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4671 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 244 of 403 (602509)
01-28-2011 4:49 PM
Reply to: Message 241 by jar
01-28-2011 4:33 PM


Re: Evidence?
Actually, the terms pro-life and pro-choice are classic examples of Humpty-Dumpty definitions. I'll give the folk marketing the anti-abortion, pro-forced parenthood, pro-rape parenthood, pro-incest parenthood, pro illicit abortion, pro uncontrolled abortion position lots of credit for choosing the moniker "pro-life".
But the fact is that they did just decide what the words would mean.
There is a difference between inventing a new word you like, and giving it a definition, and taking a pre-existing word, who already has a definition, and redefine it how you like it ...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 241 by jar, posted 01-28-2011 4:33 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 247 by jar, posted 01-28-2011 5:03 PM slevesque has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 245 of 403 (602512)
01-28-2011 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by slevesque
01-28-2011 4:47 PM


Re: Evidence?
Then you have no issue if we call you anti-choice?

"What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof."-Hitch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 4:47 PM slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 5:39 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 246 of 403 (602513)
01-28-2011 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by slevesque
01-28-2011 4:35 PM


Re: Evidence?
slevesque writes:
And if the government decided to give more ressources to woman who wanted to keep their babies, I would be the one paying for it.
You said yourself that not enough was being done. So do more. Lobby for higher taxes or do more privately so the government doesn't have to do it for you.

"I'm Rory Bellows, I tell you! And I got a lot of corroborating evidence... over here... by the throttle!"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 4:35 PM slevesque has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 247 of 403 (602514)
01-28-2011 5:03 PM
Reply to: Message 244 by slevesque
01-28-2011 4:49 PM


Re: Evidence?
slevesque writes:
Actually, the terms pro-life and pro-choice are classic examples of Humpty-Dumpty definitions. I'll give the folk marketing the anti-abortion, pro-forced parenthood, pro-rape parenthood, pro-incest parenthood, pro illicit abortion, pro uncontrolled abortion position lots of credit for choosing the moniker "pro-life".
But the fact is that they did just decide what the words would mean.
There is a difference between inventing a new word you like, and giving it a definition, and taking a pre-existing word, who already has a definition, and redefine it how you like it ...
But in the case of the terms "pro-life" and "pro-choice" it was an example of both creating and redefining new words. Choosing to create and define "pro-life" was a brilliant marketing ploy.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 244 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 4:49 PM slevesque has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 248 of 403 (602516)
01-28-2011 5:05 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by slevesque
01-28-2011 4:47 PM


Re: Evidence?
slevesque writes:
There is certainly a difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion, and when the nuance is needed in one way or another, I just use the appropriate word.
Then do that here.

"I'm Rory Bellows, I tell you! And I got a lot of corroborating evidence... over here... by the throttle!"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 4:47 PM slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 5:46 PM ringo has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2982 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 249 of 403 (602517)
01-28-2011 5:11 PM
Reply to: Message 238 by New Cat's Eye
01-28-2011 4:24 PM


I'm still seeing a difference between the potential of a diploid to develop into a person and the lack of the potential of a haploid to without another haploid to join with.
I continue to contend that a daploid-(zygote) only has the potential to become an embryo. If it doesn't though, that zygote has no more potential to become a human than the previous haploid.
Haploid - potential to be a zygote. Zygote - potential to be an embryo. Embryo - potential to be a fetus. Fetus - potential to be born, and what would then be considered a baby with the potential for toddler age, teenage years, and finally an adult...which, if it's a female, has the potential to get DP'd by me and a friend.
If that's the person's reason for holding their particular moral position, and they're comfortable without being able to pinpoint the emergence of the soul, then that's gonna be their reason regardless.
It doesn't really matter that you don't like it
Not like it? Ha, I love it. Because they can't produce evidence and they remove themselves from the debate for that very reason.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 238 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-28-2011 4:24 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2982 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 250 of 403 (602518)
01-28-2011 5:12 PM
Reply to: Message 240 by AZPaul3
01-28-2011 4:30 PM


Re: Bump For Abortion Issues
Oni,
Wow.
You got to me.
Well done.
Thanks, brotha.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by AZPaul3, posted 01-28-2011 4:30 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4671 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 251 of 403 (602520)
01-28-2011 5:39 PM
Reply to: Message 245 by hooah212002
01-28-2011 4:59 PM


Re: Evidence?
define anti-choice

This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by hooah212002, posted 01-28-2011 4:59 PM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by Taq, posted 01-28-2011 5:47 PM slevesque has not replied
 Message 265 by hooah212002, posted 01-28-2011 6:29 PM slevesque has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10085
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 252 of 403 (602521)
01-28-2011 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 235 by slevesque
01-28-2011 4:14 PM


Re: Evidence?
No, but I guess it makes you pro-freespeech.
Which is why I consider myself pro-choice and not pro-abortion. I think women should have the right to an abortion, but I do wish that no abortions took place. The same for free speech and flag burning.
If you are for abortions to be legal. Then you are pro-abortion.
If I am for legalization then I am pro-legalization. That is what the "pro-" portion means, it means "for". We support the legal aspect, not the medical aspect.
There is nothing in calling someone pro-abortion that mean they rejoice at the idea of abortions.
Pro-abortion literally means "for abortions". No one here is for abortions. We are for legalization.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 4:14 PM slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 256 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 5:51 PM Taq has replied

  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4671 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009


Message 253 of 403 (602522)
01-28-2011 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by ringo
01-28-2011 5:05 PM


Re: Evidence?
As I said it's a nuance, pro-choice means someone who is for abortion to be legal and that the choice to abort or not is woman's choice.
So a pro-choice is automatically pro-abortion, but pro-abortion not necessarily pro-choice (although it would be weird to be for legal abortions. but wanting someone else to decide for the woman ...)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by ringo, posted 01-28-2011 5:05 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 255 by Taq, posted 01-28-2011 5:48 PM slevesque has not replied
 Message 257 by ringo, posted 01-28-2011 5:59 PM slevesque has replied
 Message 270 by nwr, posted 01-28-2011 6:44 PM slevesque has replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10085
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 254 of 403 (602523)
01-28-2011 5:47 PM
Reply to: Message 251 by slevesque
01-28-2011 5:39 PM


Re: Evidence?
define anti-choice
Anti-choice would be the position where someone is against the idea that a woman and a doctor should make the choice of whether to abort a pregnancy or not. Pro-choice is the position where someone believes that such a choice should be made by a woman and her doctor.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 5:39 PM slevesque has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10085
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 255 of 403 (602524)
01-28-2011 5:48 PM
Reply to: Message 253 by slevesque
01-28-2011 5:46 PM


Re: Evidence?
As I said it's a nuance, pro-choice means someone who is for abortion to be legal and that the choice to abort or not is woman's choice.
It is an important nuance nonetheless, just as the nuance between the pro-freespeech and pro-flagburning positions, or between anti-temperance and pro-alcoholism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by slevesque, posted 01-28-2011 5:46 PM slevesque has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024