Is there a legitimate argument for design?

To clarify what you want to discuss, can you provide an example or two of what people have offered in past debates with you as scientific arguments for ID, and briefly describe why you believe they're not really scientific.

Thread copied here from the Is there a legitimate argument for design? thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

Just thought I'd let y'all know.

Hi Taiji2,

I'm replying with my moderator account so I can respond to this:

taiji2 writes: Specific shot to PERCY........ if a forum moderator is not there to guarantee honest debate, what is he there for?

Moderators have dual accounts. One is a normal account with no privileges. My normal account name is Percy. My moderator account name is Admin.

Members with dual member/moderator accounts are strongly discouraged from participating and moderating the same discussion. Since I was participating as Percy I could not also moderate as Admin.

I will likely not post to this thread again as Admin. I did so only to make the difference between the two accounts clear to you.

Sometimes we're short of moderator resources at a time when a thread could use some moderation, and in that case a moderator can post a note that he is recusing himself from discussion in that thread and then will rejoin as moderator after the passage of a couple days.