Summations Only

I care as much about your threat, as you do about a Hindu threat of hell.

I worry about what you say as much as you worry about what Mormons say about which level of heaven you reach. You're going to be at a low level.
I suspect you don't worry too much about that, and nor should you.
Well that's what I do as well, same as you. Not worry about what deluded, religious, non-thinkers say.Instead of these threats why don't you try and figure out why you're always wrong.

What did Jesus ride into Jerusalem on.And ass and a colt No just a colt

I wonder what the soldiers gave him to drinkVinegar and gall No it was wine and myrrh

Who buried Jesus
Joseph of Arimathaea No the Jews and rulers did

You're wrong because you read religious sites believing the same thing you do and wall out independent thought.Could Jesus be touched before ascension?
No: Well, ya

You said a mouth full there.God doesn't get angry: If he does it's just a moment Sometimes it's a forty year moment Then sometimes, it's well, forever,

What about the unfortunate handicapped people Okay god made them that way but surely he's fair about the handicap he inflicted upon them. Not so much actually.

In my view, that's exactly what it is.
It's a made prophecy from reading OT and making Jesus fit the OT by the writer.
Then those that should know better, reading it and carefully not mentioning obvious problems of 1) anybody can be riding an ass or2) more specifically, writing in that the guy rides in on an ass to make it fit.
It's disingenuous. It started early in the game and continues today.

Sure there's lots, lots, lots more. When two equals seven, I have no doubt you can resolve anything in your head. How else could it be inerrant. (The unknown author Matthew, who helps fix the unknown author Mark's screwed up geography, has the bible record in contradictions)
You know the Quran has far, far fewer contradictions. And Allah, well he hardly kills anybody. Yahweh has him beat by a long shot.

This is nit picking, no question. It's not the broad picture. But you are asserting the bible is inerrant and it's own words show otherwise. When two and seven are the same or seven is elaborated from two. When completely opposite things standing/ falling down, voice/ no voice, never angry/ eternally angry, when they no longer mean what they clearly say..then resolution of errors is clearly just making up stuff because you don't want errors.
As I mentioned, the Quran is not riddled with the same number of contradictions.
Allah is not a murderous tyrant as Yahweh is often depicted in the bible.
So you can't show a uniqueness of your religion means anything. You can't show your god exists. The bible characters many times can not be proven to exist. The writers of the books are not always what we have been led to believe.
You are in a nearly impossible position logically .
When you say you wish you could defend it better, all you mean is you wish you could make up excuses as well as some apologists do. But they don't do any better than you. You think they do but you also think making up excuses here is a solution. It's not a solution, it is the problem.

I mean at least two writers in Genesis. I also would be interested in what Jar says though.

There are many opposite statements in the bible. Some are no consequence like what you mention here. But if the point is errancy, then it's significant.
Others are certainly important to a message purportedly given by the bible.
Judge or don't judge
Never angry/ eternally angry
Love god/Fear god/ there is no fear in love.
Righteous men/ never been a righteous man.These are significant to the bible point, from a Christian perspective.
If Christians portray the bible one way, but statements in the bible can also say the opposite and display the opposite.. I think this is more important than 2=7 or voice/no voice.
But if obvious opposite contradictions can never be accepted, then the deeply religious are not really reading the bible but rather re-writing it in their head.

I think it's problematic for both. The issue with cult Christian we'd agree on, I'd say.
But the bible is pretty poor for credibility.
Science can be said to disprove Genesis and Noah.
Things like exodus and conquest of Canaan are... suspect to didn't happen.
I think some of it is so absurd it can be outright dismissed.
Jesus is subject to some pretty weak outside the bible evidence and some pretty weak with the bible evidence.
That leaves kind of a puzzle in deciding what is myth and what might not be.
So if the bible say isn't exactly true but say points to a truth. There is some real detective work involved in that, and not much in terms of evidence a guy can use to support the "pointing".
Just my view

It's not that simple. If say Lot is called a just and righteous man. And that high esteem is only reserved for two or three guys in the bible. What does that say about the bible and the terms " just and righteous"... they didn't have a better man on the planet than an incestuous father or the words are mostly meaninglessly used.
It's bad a lot of times by it's own doing and contradictions.