Folks ought to be able to have bad ideas, or even illegal ideas in practice as long as they don't put them into action. So the idea that the DNC had secrets that they wanted to keep is fine. Given that, releasing one sides secret plans without releasing the other's is inherently unfair, and if done by a foreign government trying to influence our elections is concerning.
I read a press release from Assange a while ago, I couldn't find it with a quick google though. In it he did say that Wikileaks didn't have any Trump/Republican dirt to release, otherwise they would have, so make of that what you will.
I'm guessing you were never a Bernie supporter? Even as an Australian I'm angry at the DNC for screwing him out of the nomination. Hillarys camp in the DNC did conspire with the media to keep Bernie from winning the nom. It wasn't just an idea. From the polls I've seen he certainly should have won it and would've likely beaten Trump in the primary too. Then you've got the Clinton Foundation scam, if she was taking donations in return for favours from her govt position, that constitutes treason, no?
Maybe the government has no reason to complain, but I sure as hell do. Particular when I've also been complaining about our own government's interference.
Of course, that's why I have been careful to charge the US with hypocrisy rather than Taq or any individual American. The main reason I responded to his post was that it gave me the (false) impression that he saw it as black and white, US is good, Russia is bad.
I don't give that dirt the least bit of credence. Beyond that, I doubt I could be more disgusted with Trump if that crap were correct.
If true, it's pretty gross and childish but nothing compared to what's already come out anyway.