Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheism Cannot Rationally Explain Morals.
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 748 of 1006 (806469)
04-25-2017 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 746 by Chiroptera
04-25-2017 7:33 PM


Re: Another question:
How does someone bigger than you telling you what to do give your life meaning?
Well, would you rather be like a battery hen, whose life has a purpose, or a hawk flying free on the wind with no-one to please but itself? Obviously the battery hen has a nobler destiny.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 746 by Chiroptera, posted 04-25-2017 7:33 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 751 of 1006 (806477)
04-26-2017 12:32 AM
Reply to: Message 750 by Dredge
04-26-2017 12:29 AM


Re: You really need to drop that straw man by now
That was a strange jumble of words. It conveys little except that you are angry at science, as usual.
Have you given up on the actual topic?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 750 by Dredge, posted 04-26-2017 12:29 AM Dredge has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 754 of 1006 (806481)
04-26-2017 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 752 by Dredge
04-26-2017 12:34 AM


Yes, they could engage in an exhaustive dialogue, but most likely it will eventually reach a stalemate where it's simply one implacable opinion verses another implacable opinion. It would be like one man arguing that a Porsche is a better-looking car than a Ferrari verses another man who argues vice-versa - neither point of view can be proven correct.
And do you maintain that this would go differently if there was a God who created humankind by fiat?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 752 by Dredge, posted 04-26-2017 12:34 AM Dredge has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 756 of 1006 (806483)
04-26-2017 12:57 AM
Reply to: Message 755 by Dredge
04-26-2017 12:45 AM


If atheists are correct and there is no God or gods, then religious morality is man-made - therefore they are as just as valid as any other expression of human morality.
The conclusion doesn't seem to follow. One man-made thing can in fact be better than another: a house, a sandwich, a medical diagnosis ...
The doctrine of the flat earth is man-made (and usually religiously inspired) but we don't say that therefore it is just as valid as any other man-made opinion as to what shape the earth is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 755 by Dredge, posted 04-26-2017 12:45 AM Dredge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 808 by Dredge, posted 04-30-2017 12:40 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 766 of 1006 (806595)
04-26-2017 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 765 by Chiroptera
04-26-2017 5:19 PM


True meaning in life is attained by becoming one with the banana.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 765 by Chiroptera, posted 04-26-2017 5:19 PM Chiroptera has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 768 by 1.61803, posted 04-26-2017 5:57 PM Dr Adequate has replied
 Message 772 by Davidjay, posted 04-26-2017 10:33 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 770 of 1006 (806618)
04-26-2017 10:23 PM
Reply to: Message 769 by Davidjay
04-26-2017 9:57 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Evolutionists can not explain altruistic behaviour, as evolution states it is the survival of the fittest competition, and extinction to the losers who do not mutate every billion years.
You are of course wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 769 by Davidjay, posted 04-26-2017 9:57 PM Davidjay has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 771 of 1006 (806619)
04-26-2017 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 768 by 1.61803
04-26-2017 5:57 PM


It is not enough to embrace the banana: you must welcome it inside you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 768 by 1.61803, posted 04-26-2017 5:57 PM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 779 by Davidjay, posted 04-27-2017 9:44 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(5)
Message 784 of 1006 (806749)
04-27-2017 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 779 by Davidjay
04-27-2017 9:44 AM


Re: Banana comments are foolish and violations IMO
Your banana comments are pure foolishness, and sexual.
Sexual? David, I don't know how you go about getting a banana inside you, but for most of us this is not a sexual act. See, I eat them. Are you by some chance sticking them up your arse?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 779 by Davidjay, posted 04-27-2017 9:44 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(2)
Message 795 of 1006 (806883)
04-28-2017 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 793 by Faith
04-28-2017 3:36 PM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Not to mention all the commands about self-denial, dying to self, loving your enemies, doing good to those who persecute you, doing the extra mile, making yourself a living sacrifice, loving your neighbor as yourself and so on
But dwise1's point is that insofar as you're doing this for Christian reasons, you're doing this for selfish reasons, to suck up to God. As can be seen from the fact that if God told you to kill your enemies (as he does from time to time in the Bible) you would in principle do that instead. Or indeed if he told you to kill your friends and family. Abraham didn't get all famous by saying "No Lord, I won't kill my son just to please you, that wouldn't be altruistic".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 793 by Faith, posted 04-28-2017 3:36 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 797 by Chiroptera, posted 04-28-2017 9:31 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 800 of 1006 (806932)
04-29-2017 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 799 by Davidjay
04-29-2017 9:06 AM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Then how can you believe in evolution which favours inequality and branching, and superior races and superior people rather than EQUALITY.
But you remember how this is shit you made up?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 799 by Davidjay, posted 04-29-2017 9:06 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 814 of 1006 (806983)
04-30-2017 2:25 AM
Reply to: Message 813 by Dredge
04-30-2017 1:03 AM


That's not an answer to the question you were asked, Dredge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 813 by Dredge, posted 04-30-2017 1:03 AM Dredge has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 815 of 1006 (806984)
04-30-2017 2:30 AM
Reply to: Message 808 by Dredge
04-30-2017 12:40 AM


You make an excellent point: Things that are intelligently designed for a purpose can be assigned meaning.
But that is not what I said, nor will you successfully deceive anyone by pretending that I did.
I said that one man-made object can be better than another: do you admit it?
---
(BTW, I should be interested to know what meaning you assign to a sandwich, and why you feel that your ability to do relates in some way to it being intelligently designed. But this has nothing to do with what I said.)
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 808 by Dredge, posted 04-30-2017 12:40 AM Dredge has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 829 of 1006 (807122)
05-01-2017 12:23 AM
Reply to: Message 825 by Davidjay
04-30-2017 9:08 PM


Re: Atheists/Evolutionists can not explain morality
David, don't you find that you look fucking stupid preaching about morality when you yourself are such a filthy liar?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 825 by Davidjay, posted 04-30-2017 9:08 PM Davidjay has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 847 of 1006 (807219)
05-01-2017 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 831 by Dredge
05-01-2017 1:26 AM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
Well done, Dj; you have pointed out the existential absurdity of naturalistic evolution: A mindless process that relies on the rule of the jungle somehow produces human beings - who don't live by the law of the jungle; a mindless process in which equality has no place somehow produces human beings - who value equality.
It's much like the existential absurdity of baking, in which a process that isn't a cake somehow produces a cake.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 831 by Dredge, posted 05-01-2017 1:26 AM Dredge has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 848 of 1006 (807220)
05-01-2017 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 830 by Dredge
05-01-2017 1:17 AM


Re: Evolutionists can not explain morals
You are of the opinion that genocide is immoral, but how can you prove that genocide is immoral? If you can't prove that genocide is immoral, then it's just your opinion verses the opinion of this God.
If this is the case, it would still be the case if creationists were right about creationism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 830 by Dredge, posted 05-01-2017 1:17 AM Dredge has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024