Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Right Side of the News
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5382 of 5796 (873378)
03-15-2020 8:45 AM
Reply to: Message 5351 by Faith
03-14-2020 10:16 AM


Re: Red baiting
Faith writes:
I don't know if I'm a McCarthyite or not. Don't know enough about the investigations he did.
Gee, if only there were a resource at everyone's fingertips that could provide information about anything. Ah, well, you can lead a horse to water...
There are probably elements of it I would disagree with. But as for the basic idea that Communism is UnAmerican yes I certainly agree with that.
McCarthyism means weaponizing derogatory labels without regard to their truth, accuracy or consequences, and in your case you're even using the same derogatory label of communism that McCarthy used. He once produced a list from his pocket (that no one was given the opportunity to examine) that he claimed contained a long list of State Department employees who were communists known to the Department itself. It eventually became apparent that McCarthy had no such list, no private conduit into government of where all the communists were hiding, and that he was just playing a political game with people's lives. Most who lost their jobs and livelihoods (remember blacklisting?) as a result of McCarthy's lies were not members of the Communist Party.
You are without doubt a McCarthyite. Look it up, it isn't that hard. You should read Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds sometime. It explains Trump followers and why people are buying up all the toilet paper.
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Grammar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5351 by Faith, posted 03-14-2020 10:16 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5384 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 11:37 AM Percy has replied
 Message 5386 by dwise1, posted 03-15-2020 12:06 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 5387 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 12:21 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5383 of 5796 (873379)
03-15-2020 8:51 AM
Reply to: Message 5353 by Faith
03-14-2020 10:39 AM


Re: Red baiting
Faith writes:
Snopes is well known as Leftist. Sometimes they have good stuff, sometimes not.
My my, aren't we the little McCarthyite. You're using the term leftist as a synonym for unobjectively biased against the right, and as a smear, and as an excuse for automatically ignoring information and evidence without examining it. With you, truth and accuracy are nowhere in sight.
I go with my sources in a pinch.
You're not in a pinch, and you haven't revealed anything about your sources, which are probably the same discredited right-wing pundits you always cite.
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Clarify.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5353 by Faith, posted 03-14-2020 10:39 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5385 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 11:38 AM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5424 of 5796 (873459)
03-15-2020 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 5358 by Faith
03-15-2020 3:58 AM


Re: Trump Refuses Responsibility for Extant Policies
Faith writes:
On the Trump Bashing Thread,...
You mean the The Trump Presidency thread where attempts at keeping up with Trump's misdeeds and mismanagement have been largely abandoned because there is just too much of it?
...in Message 3778 we have a perfect example of the kind of out-of-context cherry picking done by the Left in the never ending effort to make Trump look bad.
Trump doesn't need any help looking bad - he does it all by himself. The image provides quotes from four presidents, Roosevelt, Truman, Obama and Trump, but only the quotes from Truman and Trump are relevant. Putting their quotes side-by-side shows the huge disparity in willingness to accept responsibility. For Trump everything he does is perfect. Anything bad about anything was either someone else's fault, usually Obama's, or is just a hoax of the left mischaracterizing his perfection. Here's how that image should have appeared:


     


The context is a press conference on Friday that was all about how his administration had arrived at methods for speeding up testing for the corona virus, which he was claiming was slowed down by the regulations that were already in place. It was those regulations that he said he was not responsible for.
Regulations slowed down production and distribution of coronavirus tests? Really? What regulations would those be? He'd been assuring Americans that whoever wants to be tested can be tested, but now suddenly there are regulations preventing it? Regulations that no one, including him except on Friday, has ever mentioned? Even his infectious diseases point man Dr. Anthony Fauci has never mentioned them, and he was on both ABC's and NBC's Sunday morning shows. Dr. Fauci mentioned other issues, but not regulation.
Even worse, Mass General, one of the top hospitals in the country, was so concerned about the federal government's inability to provide test kits that they developed their own but were prevented from using it until they obtained FDA approval on Friday.
Of course the questioner he was answering was making the usual Leftist style accusation, trying to catch him in something. He tells the truth and is made out to be irresponsible (or in other cases a llar etc).
Trump was asked if he took responsibility for the testing lag. His answer was no, that the fault lay elsewhere, anywhere but him.
If the slowness of testing methods was indeed due to regulations that were already in place, why shouldn't he simply truthfully say he was not responsible for them?
If you find out what regulations he was referring to you let us know. In the meantime it is safe to conclude that Trump was lying again. It's his go to device, his MO.
His whole speech was about the measures he was taking to speed up the process by engaging the business community in the effort, the Capitalist way, the Free Enterprise way, the American way. Hooray say I.
This is the reason efforts weren't expanded a month or two ago, because until the last few days Trump was saying things like (not an exact quote), "We only have 29 cases now and that will soon go to zero."
Here's Politico's report:
President Donald Trump on Friday deflected blame for his administration’s lagging ability to test Americans for the coronavirus outbreak, insisting instead without offering evidence that fault lies with his predecessor, Barack Obama.
I don't take responsibility at all, Trump said defiantly, pointing to an unspecified set of circumstances and rules, regulations and specifications from a different time.
He sometimes doesn't do the best job of defending himself,...
I think most would agree that defending significant failures in judgment and knowledge by lying and blaming others is a poor approach.
...but he's often blamed for the failures of the previous administration and this is just another of them. For Obama the press would happily fill in for anything he left out of his speech.
Obama has been out of office for over three years. Trump might at least show some originality and find a new scapegoat. Maybe try a mirror.
As for testing itself, it's really not clear what good it would do except in the case of someone who has symptoms, or somebody who is known to have been exposed, in which case the virus can be ruled in or out.
Test kits aren't needed for those exposed. Quarantine is sufficient in such cases, for one famous example, Ted Cruz. He's in self-quarantine right now.
The test kit is needed for those who have symptoms that point in that direction, and right now there aren't enough test kits for that purpose.
The vast majority who are symptomatic are going to have something else, the flu or just a cold etc.
I don't know if you are right or wrong. I'm only commenting because it's very unlikely you know, either. You're likely just passing on something you heard on one of your right-wing talk shows.
If someone without symptoms tests negative that doesn't mean the person might not get the virus later, or in fact already has it but it hasn't manifested in symptoms yet.
You're seriously trying to minimize the importance of test kits just because ultimate responsibility for their unavailability lies with Trump?
In any case there's no point in testing everybody.
Who said anything about testing everybody?
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Grammar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5358 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 3:58 AM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5425 of 5796 (873463)
03-15-2020 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 5361 by Faith
03-15-2020 4:24 AM


Re: Trump Refuses Responsibility for Extant Policies
With more than 120 messages posted since early this morning, this thread is pulling away me. I assume this is because of a blizzard of absurd and irrational posts from you.
Faith writes:
I agree that it might have been politically more effective if he'd accepted the responsibility, since he's the one that would have to deal with it in any case. But I accept his denial as fair because the question was the usual Leftist accusation...
After Trump's constant denials of the seriousness of the coronavirus threat, asking him if he accepts responsibility for the lack of testing is a very reasonable question.
...and in actual fact he isn't responsible for the policies that were already in place that slowed down the testing processes.
Which policies would those be? Trump didn't say, and no one seems to have any idea what he's talking about. And aren't any policies now in place Trump's responsibility?
Your attitude seems be, "If it's good then Trump's responsible, and if it's bad then it's not ."
HOWEVER, if he'd accepted responsibility the Left would find a way to chew him to bits anyway, for failing to speed up the processes that he had no way of speeding up.
Given that no one knows what these policies are or whether they even exist, including you, how could you know Trump had no way of speeding them up? And if these policies are actually real then obviously since things are now speeding up then Trump did have a way of speeding them up. So which is it? Either the policies don't exist and Trump was making it up, or the policies do exist and Trump could have sped them up but didn't because he wanted to ignore the impending crisis instead of doing his job.
Perhaps he could have said all of this, taking responsibility just because he's the one in charge, but going on to explain that he had no actual ability to speed things up because of the systems already in place.
Again, you have no idea what "systems" Trump was referring to or whether they even exist.
I have a feeling that wouldn't satisfy the media either of course because nothing would because he's Trump.
The media would have reported that Trump accepted responsibility, and pundits would probably have expressed surprise given his history of denying all responsibility for anything bad.
Interesting factoid: on Meet the Press today they revealed polling showing that the seriousness with which people are treating the virus threat differs widely between Democrats and Republicans, even among older people, the most vulnerable group. Republicans are much more likely to play down the seriousness. This means they're much more likely to continue normal activity, including going out to restaurants and then visiting poor grandma.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5361 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 4:24 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5433 by Minnemooseus, posted 03-16-2020 1:56 AM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5426 of 5796 (873465)
03-15-2020 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 5363 by Faith
03-15-2020 4:32 AM


Re: Trump Refuses Responsibility for Extant Policies
Faith writes:
dwise1 writes:
Tools for dealing with the emerging pandemic (eg, the WHO test for who is infected) were rejected by the Trump administration. As a result, we are at least one and at most two months behind. Trump claims that he is not responsible?
I believe they were rejected by the CDC, not the Trump administration,...
That would be incorrect. No person or department within government has stepped up to take responsibility. From How testing failures allowed coronavirus to sweep the U.S. - POLITICO from a little over a week ago:
quote:
But neither the CDC nor the coronavirus task force chaired by Vice President Mike Pence would say who made the decision to forgo the WHO test and instead begin a protracted process of producing an American test, one that got delayed by manufacturing problems, possible lab contamination and logistical delays.
Also note that the above describes the reasons for the delays, revealing Trump's claim of rules, regulations and specifications from a different time to be false, just as suspected.
If Trump hadn't shut down the White House pandemic office (formal name: National Security Council Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense) back in 2018 then perhaps a different decision might have been made.
...but as I understand it they would NOT have been effective for dealing with the current pandemic.
This is just nonsense. The WHO test is for the current pandemic. From the same article:
quote:
On Saturday Jan. 11 a month and a half before the first Covid-19 case not linked to travel was diagnosed in the United States Chinese scientists posted the genome of the mysterious new virus, and within a week virologists in Berlin had produced the first diagnostic test for the disease.
Soon after, researchers in other nations rolled out their own tests, too, sometimes with different genetic targets. By the end of February, the World Health Organization had shipped tests to nearly 60 countries.
You sure manage to cram a lot of error into a small number of words.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5363 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 4:32 AM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5427 of 5796 (873466)
03-15-2020 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 5376 by Faith
03-15-2020 5:57 AM


Re: Red baiting
Faith writes:
There is nothing anti-science about the Trump administration or anyone on the Right.
Amazon.com
Trump apparently had a doozy of a press conference today where he misstated many facts and provided false and misleading assurances: https://www.vox.com/...ump-google-fed-relax-press-conference
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Try to get link to render.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5376 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 5:57 AM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5428 of 5796 (873467)
03-15-2020 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 5378 by Faith
03-15-2020 5:59 AM


Re: Red baiting
Faith writes:
This is not the thread for a creationist discussion.
So much for reading comprehension.
DWise1 wasn't discussing creationism, just referring to you as a creationist as part of his characterizing you as anti-science. The evidence might even suggest something beyond anti-science and more like anti-reality. If it's not true then why don't you respond substantively to his Message 5374 instead of being evasive.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5378 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 5:59 AM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5429 of 5796 (873468)
03-15-2020 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 5384 by Faith
03-15-2020 11:37 AM


Re: Red baiting
Faith writes:
I really have a problem remembering some things,...
No kidding.
...besides having a problem reading lengthy white pages of information,...
Yes, we know. Given that most of the Internet is "lengthy white pages of information" you're reduced to listening to conservative wingnuts. It explains your combination of ignorance and crazy ideas.
...which is I hope more of an explanation than an excuse.
Your claims of inability to access cited information is nearly always proportional to how wrong you are.
What I'm not remembering at the moment so I can't look it up is some information that came out from Russia a few decades after McCarthy that validated a lot of what he was identifying as Communism.
So you're doubling down on your McCarthyite accusations to further claim that McCarthy was right? You've been listening to wingnuts again.
Hm. I'll go look it up with what little I'm able to remember.
I can hardly wait. Let me save you some trouble since a Google search turned it up, first search I tried, took two seconds. You're thinking of Blacklisted by History - Wikipedia.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5384 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 11:37 AM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5430 of 5796 (873469)
03-15-2020 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 5385 by Faith
03-15-2020 11:38 AM


Re: Red baiting
Faith writes:
Percy writes:
Faith writes:
Snopes is well known as Leftist. Sometimes they have good stuff, sometimes not.
My my, aren't we the little McCarthyite. You're using the term leftist as a synonym for unobjectively biased against the right, and as a smear, and as an excuse for automatically ignoring information and evidence without examining it. With you, truth and accuracy are nowhere in sight.
I know you don't like the word Leftist but I believe I use it accurately.
You did not use the term "leftist" accurately because Snopes isn't leftist, and you *are* using at as a smear and as an excuse for ignoring information.
It certainly applies to many things you say as well as others here at EvC.
You use the term "leftist" as an epithet, but of course some things I say are left of center because I'm a social liberal (and a fiscal conservative), but most of the time you're just casting the term "leftist" at anyone who disagrees with you. It's as if you believe that calling someone a name is a meaningful and sufficient argument in favor of your position.
What it tells most people is that you have no facts and/or rationale. What people find frustrating is that you carry on discussions in a complete fog of ignorance and misinformation without any self-awareness that that's what you're doing.
The term left of center also applies to many things other people say here, because many people here are left of center. Oh, what a surprise, left of center people advocate for left of center views.
But your biggest and constant transgression is to accuse those with the temerity to disagree with your political views as evil. You do not suffer disagreement well.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5385 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 11:38 AM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5432 by PaulK, posted 03-16-2020 1:44 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5431 of 5796 (873470)
03-15-2020 9:18 PM
Reply to: Message 5387 by Faith
03-15-2020 12:21 PM


Re: Some validation of McCarthy
Faith writes:
Well what I found isn't what I thought I remembered,...
The reason it feels like you didn't find what you thought you remembered is because you didn't actually find the thing you were thinking of. Again, you were thinking of Blacklisted by History - Wikipedia.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5387 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 12:21 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5436 by Faith, posted 03-16-2020 8:12 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


(1)
Message 5435 of 5796 (873481)
03-16-2020 7:15 AM
Reply to: Message 5433 by Minnemooseus
03-16-2020 1:56 AM


Re: Non-reverse pyschology in action?
Minnemooseus writes:
This seems to be a devious use of non-reverse psychology by Democrats, in an attempt to enhance the dying off of Republicans. Or would it be reverse reverse psychology?
I accept at face value that the polls are telling us that how seriously someone takes the coronavirus threat depends upon their political affiliation. Those who trust Trump's information or that of many of his zombies in Congress do not take the threat anywhere near as seriously as those who don't and who instead get their information from a reliable source of health information such as Dr. Fauci or the CDC or many of the state governors.
Some examples:
The CDCCancel or postpone events of 50-plus people for the next eight weeks.
Many statesBars and restaurants are closed except for take out or have been requested to reduce occupancy. Those over 65 have been advised to self-quarantine.
Devin Nunes (R-CA)"It's a great time to go out and go to a local restaurant, likely you can get in easy. Let's not hurt the working people in this country ... go to your local pub."
President Trump (R-DC)"It's a very contagious virus, it's incredible, but it's something we have tremendous control of."
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5433 by Minnemooseus, posted 03-16-2020 1:56 AM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5438 of 5796 (873484)
03-16-2020 8:18 AM


A History of Trump Assurances That All is Well
This history of Trump's pronouncements of how we're not in any serious danger from the coronavirus is taken from Opinion | A Complete List of Trump’s Attempts to Play Down Coronavirus - The New York Times:
Jan. 22False information: In response to the question, "Are there worries about a pandemic at this point? Trump's response: "No. Not at all. And we have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China, and we have it under control. It’s going to be just fine."
Jan. 24False information: "It will all work out well." (tweet)
Jan. 28False information: "Johnson & Johnson to create coronavirus vaccine." (false)
Jan. 30False information: "We have it very well under control. We have very little problem in this country at this moment five. And those people are all recuperating successfully."
Jan. 31False information: "Well, we pretty much shut it down coming in from China. We have a tremendous relationship with China, which is a very positive thing. Getting along with China, getting along with Russia, getting along with these countries."
Feb. 10False information: "Looks like by April, you know, in theory, when it gets a little warmer, it miraculously goes away."
Feb. 19False information: "I think the numbers are going to get progressively better as we go along."
Feb. 23False infomration: "[The situation is] very much under control...We had 12, at one point. And now they’ve gotten very much better. Many of them are fully recovered."
Feb. 25Blaming others: "Cryin’ Chuck Schumer is complaining, for publicity purposes only, that I should be asking for more money than $2.5 Billion to prepare for Coronavirus. If I asked for more he would say it is too much. He didn’t like my early travel closings. I was right. He is incompetent!" (tweet)
Feb. 26False information: "We’re going down, not up. We’re going very substantially down, not up."
Feb. 26False information: "It’s going to disappear. One day it’s like a miracle it will disappear."
Feb. 28Blaming others and false information: "The Democrat policy of open borders is a direct threat to the health and well-being of all Americans. Now you see it with the coronavirus, you see it. You see it with the coronavirus."
Feb. 28Blaming others and false information: "And now we have tremendous flexibility. Many, many more sites. Many, many more people. And you couldn’t have had that under the Obama rule, and we ended that rule very quickly."
Feb. 29False information: "I think this process [vaccine approval] will go very quickly..this process is going to go very quickly.
Mar. 2False information: "We’re talking about a much smaller range of deaths than from the flu."
Mar. 4False information: "It’s very mild."
Mar. 6False information: "Anybody that wants a test can get a test."
Mar. 6Braggadocio: "I like this stuff. I really get it. People are surprised that I understand it. Every one of these doctors said, How do you know so much about this? Maybe I have a natural ability. Maybe I should have done that instead of running for President."
Mar. 7False assurances: "I’m not concerned at all."
Mar. 10False assurances: "It will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away."
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Typo.

Replies to this message:
 Message 5439 by Coragyps, posted 03-16-2020 9:47 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5440 of 5796 (873488)
03-16-2020 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 5400 by Faith
03-15-2020 2:56 PM


Re: Trump Refuses Responsibility for Extant Policies
Faith writes:
A perfectly reasonable response from Trump of course, if they aren't needed get rid of them.
Like firemen who sit around much of the time, we do need an emergency preparedness team for health emergencies, as our present circumstances are vividly demonstrating. Trump was blowing hot air.
And as he said they can get them back if they want.
This is just Trump blowing more hot air. When you eliminate firemen jobs they go off and find other jobs. It is the same with the people on the emergency preparedness team. Also, the analogy with firemen breaks down in the nature of the work. The emergency preparedness team provides their benefit from the preparations they make before emergencies. Once the emergency has already happened it is too late to get much benefit from a newly regathered emergency preparedness team. All they can do at that point is say stuff like, "Well, what you should have been doing a few months ago was such-and-so."
And again, he refused responsibility for policies that were in place before he took office, that he considers to be inadequate. Nothing wrong with that response either, except in the weird cloudy minds of leftists.
Now *you're* blowing hot air. No one has any idea what these policies are, and Trump is likely making it up. When are you going to stop letting this guy pull the wool over your eyes? How many times is enough for you? I'm guessing infinity.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5400 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 2:56 PM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5441 of 5796 (873490)
03-16-2020 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 5411 by Faith
03-15-2020 3:12 PM


Re: Trump Refuses Responsibility for Extant Policies
Faith writes:
I don't know either what policies were in place to deal with pandemics before he took office...
And you'll never know what these policies were, because Trump was making it up. If you truly believe he wasn't making it up then just try to find out what these policies were and report back to us. Blaming Obama for things is Trump's main go to refuge from criticism.
Trump puts most of his energy into managing the news cycle to his advantage instead of leading the country through the crisis. He's reacting, not leading. He figures out what to do by watching Fox News and talking to his cronies instead of listening to experts.
Here's some of what Ben Rhodes, former Deputy NSA advisor, said in a recent interview about the emergency preparedness team (https://thehill.com/...-trump-obama-left-him-a-global-health):
quote:
I think, importantly, what Obama did leave Trump is a global health infrastructure that we had set up informed by the lessons of the Ebola outbreak
...
And what we did is set up, in the White House, ... an office that was responsible for managing pandemics, managing global health threats that was shut down two years ago by President Trump.
...
And when you don’t have an office like that, you don’t have dedicated people inside the White House who are ensuring that information is acted upon. When you see an outbreak in a place like Wuhan, China, you want people in the White House who are thinking about what needs to be done right away so that you don’t get behind the curve, which is what happened in this White House.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5411 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 3:12 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5442 by Faith, posted 03-16-2020 11:05 AM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 5443 of 5796 (873494)
03-16-2020 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 5419 by Faith
03-15-2020 3:26 PM


Re: Trump Refuses Responsibility for Extant Policies
Faith writes:
Good grief. Knowing about it now doesn't mean he knew about it at the moment of the decision. Maybe he forgot, who knoews, who cares.
I think he's doing a good job at leadership myself.
I can only echo DrJones* comments. He doesn't know or maybe forgot? What criteria are you applying to assess leadership?
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5419 by Faith, posted 03-15-2020 3:26 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5444 by Faith, posted 03-16-2020 11:24 AM Percy has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024