The Right Side of the News

As always your lying ELFTIST smear tactic is showing. Oh and DO PLEASE stop responding. You are worse than any troll.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Trump did not and would not call Nazis "fine people" and condemned them twice on that video.

It's very clear on the video that Trump mentioned four groups: good people and bad people in each of two groups, the bad people being the Nazis and white supremacists on the Right and Antifa on the Left which had shown up to do violence. He clearly had in mind a group of "fine people" who were just there to protest the taking down of the statues, and similarly fine people on the other side of that. FOUR groups, two "bad" and two "fine." \\itIt takes a Fake News Leftist Liar to believe that he called Nazis "fine people."It doesn't matter what YOU think, that's what HE thought.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Any idiot can tell what Trump meant, it's just political spin that keeps them from acknowledging it. ANYTHING to smear Trump with, ANYTHING. The biggest fattest lies will do.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

. twenty people lying to one telling the truth about what Trump said is a bit of overkill.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

LFTSTS are truly accomplished LYRs.

He very clearly did NOT call Nazis "fine people." You are the one with the ridiculous dogma, designed only to try to discredit Trumo with lyes.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Not according to Trump and it's his opinion that is the issue here. We can keep going round and round and because there are a dozen more of you than there are of me you will "win" by just repeating a lye over and over again, but the truth is that Trump never said anything to support the white supremacists as "fine people" and clearly condemned them. I know you HAVE TO brand him a racist because that's what LFETSTS do. Smearihng people as racists is the way you deal with your opponents. Amazing how slander has become acceptable argument these days so corrupt is public discourse not to mention politics as a whole.

I'd sue you for slander if I could you evil lying ******* creep.

I have made no racist comments you lyng ***** (which is a mild term for anyone who calls someone a racist who is not a racist).{I'm removing that term because it was over the top even for me, and I apologize for it} I am not a racist and any racist comments exist only in your own evil ******* -->******* -->******* -->******* -->******* -->******* -->******* mind just as they do against Trump on this thread. Lyble, fine, I'd love to sue you for lybl if only a lawyer would show up here and offer to do it pro bono, subpoena your IP number and sue you for twenty years of your income.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

I don't care about the censorship, it just shows Percy to be a crazed political partisan who can't tolerate opposition. But I am no racist and I do not deserve that and if you think I do you're a lyng ***** too.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Dear Phat,
If you are the one who wrote the explanation for the red dot about "taking one for the team," I believe you should suspend yourself a second time for that second attack on me. I also believe your first suspension was not nearly enough for the offense which was truly egregious, which is expressed in the title of this post.As you know I've many times criticized YOU for your Christian failures, mostly doctrinal in nature, and suggested that your church should discipline you for your deviations from what they teach and excommunicate you if you don't repent. But I don't recall ever sinking to the foul level you have just exhibited against me. AND since you are doctrinally compromised I don't see any reason to take your Lbrl Christian complaints against me seriously.Perhaps I should be disciplined for losing my temper so extremely at times, but I don't think anyone could say I haven't been extremely provoked. If you think that retroactively suspending me for my meltdown is justified I won't argue it, but I think others deserve the same treatment.Sorry but I do believe that being called a racist is a huge offense that deserves some kind of extreme denunciation. I think you should have disciplined Theodoric for that too for both me and marc9000 who is no doubt also not a racist although he didn't protest. I denounced Theodoric because I figured nobody else would, which is par for the course at EvC over the last few years, but I'll take it back if you would like to do the job yourself. I believe a number of days of suspension would be appropriate, though at least a week for your offense. And while you're at it you owe me an apology for this attack on me.I'll say again that I get so angry at the ******* -->******* stupidities here I could chew nails, and while I believe the Lord is also opposed to the ******* -->******* craziness He doesn't want me erupting as I do either.But YOU are a typical "librl Christian" wimp who mistakes wimpery and mindless accommodation to evil for Christian love. That in itself gets me angry. I won't defend my eruptions beyond what I've already said, but I do have to say that your version of Christian love is a big fat fraud.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

As I believe I stated some time back (Message 1164), I discovered that Lee opposed the erecting of monuments and would have opposed his own statue, and that the people who erected it were avowed white supremacists. That led me to the view that it should be pulled down for that reason if no other. I do generally support the argument about men of their time but it seems there is this other factor in his case. NEVERTHELESS, with the correct captioning perhaps it should stay because he was such a prominent figure in his time.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

And now YOU should be suspended for personal attack. All this has gone way too far.

I'm not at all angry, I'm giving a calm reasoned judgment. You should be suspended for personally attacking me.