|
Author
|
Topic: Falsifying a young Universe. (re: Supernova 1987A)
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 759 of 948 (841121)
10-08-2018 10:22 AM
|
Reply to: Message 758 by creation
10-08-2018 9:51 AM
|
|
Re: A couple questions for creation ...
What causes the change in how time works further away from the Earth?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 758 by creation, posted 10-08-2018 9:51 AM | | creation has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 769 of 948 (841195)
10-09-2018 2:21 AM
|
Reply to: Message 767 by creation
10-09-2018 12:32 AM
|
|
Re: A couple questions for creation ...
I’m sorry, I wasn’t very clear. I’m asking in your opinion: what causes the change in how time works the further away things are? And what is the rate of change? Is it proportional to the distance?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 767 by creation, posted 10-09-2018 12:32 AM | | creation has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 770 of 948 (841196)
10-09-2018 2:26 AM
|
Reply to: Message 764 by creation
10-09-2018 12:27 AM
|
|
Re: Voyager 1 enters new space
Creation writes: The bible makes more sense if your old age models and stellar evolution stuff is wrong.
I see now. This is all just to get your religion to work.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 764 by creation, posted 10-09-2018 12:27 AM | | creation has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 773 of 948 (841201)
10-09-2018 3:33 AM
|
Reply to: Message 764 by creation
10-09-2018 12:27 AM
|
|
Re: Voyager 1 enters new space
Hypothetically, if it was shown that space time had the same qualities regardless of distance to Earth, how would that affect your faith in Jesus?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 764 by creation, posted 10-09-2018 12:27 AM | | creation has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 782 of 948 (841306)
10-11-2018 9:29 AM
|
Reply to: Message 777 by creation
10-11-2018 9:05 AM
|
|
Re: A couple questions for creation ...
Do you have any evidence that God changes the way time and space work the further way from Earth we go?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 777 by creation, posted 10-11-2018 9:05 AM | | creation has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 786 of 948 (841388)
10-12-2018 3:39 AM
|
Reply to: Message 784 by creation
10-11-2018 11:32 PM
|
|
Re: A couple questions for creation ...
I understand that you state that science does not know. I’m not arguing against that. I’m asking you what evidence you have for your assertion that space and time change the further you go from Earth.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 784 by creation, posted 10-11-2018 11:32 PM | | creation has replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 795 of 948 (841437)
10-12-2018 6:36 PM
|
Reply to: Message 793 by creation
10-12-2018 5:43 PM
|
|
Re: A couple questions for creation ...
I see what you mean. So you’re position is one that comports with the Biblical record and that time cannot, by definition be constant in distant places (on an astronomical scale)?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 793 by creation, posted 10-12-2018 5:43 PM | | creation has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 153 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(2)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 812 of 948 (841724)
10-20-2018 3:19 PM
|
Reply to: Message 806 by Son Goku
10-19-2018 4:35 PM
|
|
Re: Confusing
Because Jesus, silly.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 806 by Son Goku, posted 10-19-2018 4:35 PM | | Son Goku has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2