Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8936 total)
28 online now:
PaulK, Percy (Admin), RAZD, Tangle (4 members, 24 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: ssope
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 861,617 Year: 16,653/19,786 Month: 778/2,598 Week: 24/251 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List')
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 316 of 1043 (641303)
11-18-2011 2:20 PM


Honestly, this place has the best Mods on any message board I post on.

I think it is because this place is run by liberals.

It reminds me of the internet of 5-10 years ago (when it was all liberals).

The reason is because I rarely agree with anyone on any site, I am the heel, the devils advocate (seen as a troll by morons, but there is a difference if you have a brain).

On a conservative run site, they just ignore logic, and censor you and ban you, they don't care.

On a liberal site, they just call you names, and tell you how stupid you are, and suspend you. You have to be a total ass to get banned, and most of the time they will let you come back even if they banned you last week.

So yeah, no complaints here, keep up the good work you cat loving liberal commies.


Replies to this message:
 Message 317 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-18-2011 3:05 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded
 Message 318 by Larni, posted 11-18-2011 3:47 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 468 of 1043 (663351)
05-23-2012 1:30 PM


the hilarity that is the double standard that is EvC
anyone can call me names, but if i call someone else a name, OH BEWARE.

O.O

look on ANY thread where I called ANYONE a name, and you will see that someone else called me a name FIRST, it was not moderated (thus making it ok), and all my name calling is retaliatory and in self defense against those who call me names 1st.

basically someone throws the 1st punch and I throw the 2nd and then I get in trouble for it, while the real troll (who threw the 1st punch) walks away. (the double standard I speak so much about).

I realize that by having a different opinion that the majority I will not get a fair shake. but it is too me expected from the left, they always act this way.

Edited by Artemis Entreri, : No reason given.

Edited by Artemis Entreri, : No reason given.


Admin writes:

I have removed the posting permissions of Artemis Entreri in this forum, Creation/Evolution In The News.
For everyone else, the topic is legislation in Tennessee. Please stay on topic.

"if you cant beat them censor them" --liberal mantra

Replies to this message:
 Message 472 by Theodoric, posted 05-23-2012 2:10 PM Artemis Entreri has responded
 Message 473 by subbie, posted 05-23-2012 3:01 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded
 Message 474 by crashfrog, posted 05-23-2012 3:24 PM Artemis Entreri has responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 469 of 1043 (663352)
05-23-2012 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 465 by anglagard
05-23-2012 12:24 AM


can I try and translate?
anglagard writes:

I must agree with fearandloathing, AE is a self-admitted troll, his proper environment is 4chan /b/, reddit or perhaps even stormfront.

I want to ad hominem and call someone names who has opinion that i disagree with and because he is unpopular i can get away with it.

perhaps even stormfront

godwin's law, lulz

I am here to learn and on the rare occasion teach, not be pestered by obvious hecklers, I feel he serves no purpose on this forum.

his opinions are different than mine and therefore should not be allowed to be read.

Of course this is simply my opinion for what it is worth. Such a decision to ban lies with those who have invested the most time and treasure.

please censor and ban ANYONE who has different views than us.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 465 by anglagard, posted 05-23-2012 12:24 AM anglagard has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 471 by ringo, posted 05-23-2012 1:58 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


(1)
Message 487 of 1043 (663443)
05-24-2012 5:05 PM
Reply to: Message 472 by Theodoric
05-23-2012 2:10 PM


Re: Now this is hilarious
i'd love to respond to you, but im afraid you'll cry like the man you are not, and then run to the admin like the man that you are not.

Admin writes:

I have removed the posting permissions of Artemis Entreri in this forum, Creation/Evolution In The News.
For everyone else, the topic is legislation in Tennessee. Please stay on topic.

"if you cant beat them censor them" --liberal mantra

This message is a reply to:
 Message 472 by Theodoric, posted 05-23-2012 2:10 PM Theodoric has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 493 by Theodoric, posted 05-24-2012 7:15 PM Artemis Entreri has responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


(1)
Message 488 of 1043 (663444)
05-24-2012 5:07 PM
Reply to: Message 477 by onifre
05-24-2012 1:31 AM


double standards
you know only those with a "popular" opinion here can break the rules, everyone else has to play by the rules.

Or maybe its because you aren't a baby who runs to the admin when somebody says something to you?


Admin writes:

I have removed the posting permissions of Artemis Entreri in this forum, Creation/Evolution In The News.
For everyone else, the topic is legislation in Tennessee. Please stay on topic.

"if you cant beat them censor them" --liberal mantra

This message is a reply to:
 Message 477 by onifre, posted 05-24-2012 1:31 AM onifre has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


(1)
Message 489 of 1043 (663445)
05-24-2012 5:22 PM
Reply to: Message 474 by crashfrog
05-23-2012 3:24 PM


Re: the hilarity that is the double standard that is EvC
frog writes:

1. "Self-defense?"
2. What would happen, specifically, if someone called you a name and you didn't call them a name back?


1. Yep, every time I get in trouble for name calling, it’s because I responded to a name caller, not in general, but to someone being specific and specifically targeting me.
2. I don’t know, that never happens. Most of the time lefties can only debate through character assassination. It’s their bread and butter move.
Do you have an opinion, AE? About anything? You've been here a while and I've yet to see you actually advance an argument or defend a position on anything. I don't see how you can be subject to some kind of suppression of minority opinion, when your only opinion on anything is "LOL, I don't care about that."

Sure do. Yep. You aint looking, or you are being purposely disingenuous about it, I was defending an opinion when the _______ cried to admin about me making a joke.

Nonukes writes:

At the risk of stating the obvious, the Raison d'être for a troll is generating irritated, deflected posts about the troll. The idea is to provide stinky bait, often in the form of silly, and deliberately inflammable posts and then to watch the resulting fun.
Trolls want attention, and no attention is too negative.
Please do not feed the zoo denizens. Let the keeper handle that chore.

I agree 100%, which is why I do not engage with Subbie, or Hoah; I try to not engage with Taz, Theodoric, Jar, Crashfrog, or Panda but their bait is too good sometimes. I wish I was strong enough to ignore all the trolls on this site.

Edited by Artemis Entreri, : forgot one


Admin writes:

I have removed the posting permissions of Artemis Entreri in this forum, Creation/Evolution In The News.
For everyone else, the topic is legislation in Tennessee. Please stay on topic.

"if you cant beat them censor them" --liberal mantra

This message is a reply to:
 Message 474 by crashfrog, posted 05-23-2012 3:24 PM crashfrog has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 492 by subbie, posted 05-24-2012 6:25 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


(1)
Message 491 of 1043 (663448)
05-24-2012 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 490 by Buzsaw
05-24-2012 5:45 PM


Re: AE Not So Bad
oh you got banned from them?

let me guess you have an opinion that is in the minority around here, and the only way for the "intellectuals" to silence you is to censor you?

am I close?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 490 by Buzsaw, posted 05-24-2012 5:45 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 517 of 1043 (663519)
05-25-2012 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 493 by Theodoric
05-24-2012 7:15 PM


Re: Now this is hilarious
thanks for proving my point and giving more evidence of how much of a troll you are.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 493 by Theodoric, posted 05-24-2012 7:15 PM Theodoric has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 518 of 1043 (663520)
05-25-2012 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 494 by fearandloathing
05-24-2012 7:52 PM


Re: Now this is hilarious
keep hating, i know haters like you HAVE to do it.

roflmao


This message is a reply to:
 Message 494 by fearandloathing, posted 05-24-2012 7:52 PM fearandloathing has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 522 of 1043 (663554)
05-25-2012 12:22 PM
Reply to: Message 521 by Dr Adequate
05-25-2012 12:18 PM


Re: Fyoungs posts of hate
Unfortunately many of them might agree with him that we are the epitome of evil.

wait a minute...are you stating that you are not?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 521 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-25-2012 12:18 PM Dr Adequate has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 526 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-25-2012 1:28 PM Artemis Entreri has acknowledged this reply

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 523 of 1043 (663564)
05-25-2012 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 504 by foreveryoung
05-25-2012 12:39 AM


Re: Fyoungs posts of hate
the funniest double standard around here, is that people are allowed to "troll" you at will, because you are a christian creationist.

see what happens when you say something that causes rage in one of them. it is not what happens to them when they cause rage in you.

all the while they pretend to be intellectually honest, and un-bigoted. If you pay attention around here you can see the truth, and I think you do foreveryoung.

Edited by Artemis Entreri, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 504 by foreveryoung, posted 05-25-2012 12:39 AM foreveryoung has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 525 by subbie, posted 05-25-2012 1:09 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 543 of 1043 (663771)
05-26-2012 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 528 by Adminnemooseus
05-25-2012 3:16 PM


right on
1) This is the "Free For All" forum, but the big traditional exception to the "no moderation" rule is that things should still stay on topic. Much of what is being said is pretty remote to critiquing moderation actions or non-actions.

its just seems so weird, that there is a taddle tale thread so that the little kids and tell on the big kids.

2) My impression is that mixing it up with the perceived offender (aka "Feeding the troll") doesn't help the moderators deal with the situation. Instead of having one clear cut offender, we also have a bunch of others contributing to the mess.

I like how you have perceived up there. I also like how you don't take the words so serious of those who tell lies against me. Sure I am guilty of calling people names (that call me names 1st), and I realize that "two wrongs don't make a right", but I am happy to see that you realize there are indeed two wrongs.

ps - I probably would have slammed AE hard, when this was first reported by Theodoric, but I am still a little miffed about his sniveling after the Hooah affair.

Thanks for the link, its so funny for me to see the antics of Theo and his crusade against me. to see him campaigning to you to get rid of me, i was definitely correct when i called him a ______. well at least correct in description, it may have been against the rules to call a spade a spade. but i digress.

thanks again for being objective.

Edited by Artemis Entreri, : calling theodoric what he really is is against the rules so i used a blank


This message is a reply to:
 Message 528 by Adminnemooseus, posted 05-25-2012 3:16 PM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 662 of 1043 (671622)
08-28-2012 1:27 PM


AdminPD, WTF are you doing?
still new still trying to understand.

But how is drawing the line and explaining oneself and what sort of Protestant one is referring to in a thread about Protestant Canon, anywhere close to being off topic.

I am sorry, but the way the AdminPD is around here, I am not sure if I can handle this site.

This "person" (not sure, acts like a droid) misunderstands the topic at hand and accuses everyone of being off topic and ruins a thread that people are actually posting in (unlike 99% of the mostly inactive threads on this site); and then says you can;'t repsond to its admin posts, like they are correct and final!?! look I understand this is a private site and the Admin can do what they want to, it just seems silly to effectively close a thread on some minor semantics, and accuse everyone of breaking rules and going off topic without the ability to challenge if said rules were actually broken.

I am not trying to rock the boat, its just dufficult for me to accept the strict authortarianism of such a liberal site.


Replies to this message:
 Message 663 by jar, posted 08-28-2012 1:41 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded
 Message 664 by NoNukes, posted 08-28-2012 2:04 PM Artemis Entreri has acknowledged this reply
 Message 665 by AdminPD, posted 08-28-2012 6:53 PM Artemis Entreri has responded
 Message 666 by Admin, posted 08-28-2012 8:40 PM Artemis Entreri has responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 669 of 1043 (671698)
08-29-2012 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 665 by AdminPD
08-28-2012 6:53 PM


riiight
The topic is about the canon, not the people.

was just clarifying, but I guess it does not compute with your authoritarian code.

my bad, forget i brought it up.

I'll go back to lurking, posting here is an absolute waste of time.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 665 by AdminPD, posted 08-28-2012 6:53 PM AdminPD has not yet responded

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2483 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 670 of 1043 (671710)
08-29-2012 5:12 PM
Reply to: Message 666 by Admin
08-28-2012 8:40 PM


for real?
Admin writes:

This isn't any more a private site than Facebook. Anyone can join.

EvC Forum is a moderated debate site, but moderators cannot do what they want. The Forum Guidelines are their guide. If you haven't read them already they're worth a read - there's only 10 short rules. There's also a set of Moderator Guidelines that moderators use to help them.

The suspensions and banning thread would say otherwise, for it appears you ban people willy-nilly completely arbitrarily based on your current mood. I have read through most of it, and it seems as if people get permanently banned, for the most random reasons.

Its fine, I get it its your website and you are the Chairman Mao around here.

Its more the disingenuous charade of debating, and following rules that only some people have to follow (I understand they are probably your IRL friends, and that is fine too). I find it amusing that many people here pretend and go along with it, as if there is some legitimacy to all of it.

I feel like due to all the madness, arbitrary banning, double standards in every thread, and whatever this place tries to charade itself as, that this has to be a private site that I stumbled upon. I mean why else would any new people want to participate? There is a whole thread about the lack of creationists (something that is quite odd considering the name of this place), but the whole time I'm LOLing to myself about how obvious the answer to the question is, as if this was some fair forum.

I appreciate the chance to come here and post, but I have seen enough in the past month. I am just going to go back to lurking, maybe posting occasionally if I cannot resist, maybe to tell someone they are witty or correct. Once again thanks for the time and the opportunity to join the madness around here, but I think I'll sit and watch instead. Sorry if I wasted anyone's time, I almost believed you for a minute, when I 1st created an account to post here.

Edited by Chaoticskunk, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 666 by Admin, posted 08-28-2012 8:40 PM Admin has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 671 by NoNukes, posted 08-30-2012 8:40 AM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019