The Right Side of the News

You've never been able to support your claims about fake news. You keep claiming fake news but are never able to show it. Crying "fake news" at any news you don't like is just the lazy person's know-nothing approach. There is zero effort, research and information in your cries of fake news. You've done no work at all, merely called something a name.But this isn't about fake news. This is about your error in claiming the mainstream news doesn't cover Trump rallies. Your claim is false. I've already shown you were wrong about the Phoenix rally, and about the India rally (you didn't qualify your claim by geographic location). You can concede your error now, else I will continue to post links to mainstream news items reporting on Trump rallies, which they do for every single one.They say there's an inverse relationship between knowledge and certainty. You are very certain.--Percy

Are you maybe thinking of the DNC servers, which were in the cloud? Clinton's email server was at her home. From Hillary Clinton email controversy - Wikipedia:

quote:

---

The email account used on Clinton's BlackBerry was then hosted on a private server in the basement of her home in Chappaqua, New York, but that information was not disclosed to State Department security personnel or senior State Department personnel.
...
The email server was located in the Clintons' home in Chappaqua, New York, from January 2009 until 2013, when it was sent to a data center in New Jersey before being handed over to Platte River Networks, a Denver-based information technology firm that Clinton hired to manage her email system.

---

Clinton left her position at State in February of 2013, so the server was at her home during the entire period that she was Secretary of State.--Percy

You already have a conservative whitewash of the news in your political commentators. We don't want actual news organizations to engage in any whitewash.--PercyEdited by Percy, : Clarify.

All your information comes from talk shows. Yes, we keep telling you that the conservative talk shows you listen to are not news. I reminded you that you get all your information from conservative talk shows instead of the news. As I pointed out, all you do is say this, never show it. Mark Levin is a conservative commentator, not a reporter. Unfreedom of the Press is full of fake news.--Percy

Even just when campaigning against fellow Democrats Bernie Sanders must defend his identification as a socialist, and it will become far worse should he win the nomination. He prefers the modifier "democratic," but that's a distinction without a difference for most people. A headline from today's Fox News illustrates what he will be up against: Bernie Sanders' defense of Castro's Cuba evokes socialism's brutal history | Fox News--Percy

We know what you're saying, and we also know what you're proving true: nothing. You have no data, no information, no research, just a lot of empty denigration and hate. If that's true then you should be able to show it instead of just say it.The reality is that the book is a hack job. From Mark Levin - Wikipedia:

quote:

---

Lloyd Green was critical of the book in The Guardian writing that the book "...is not exactly fan fiction but it can get ahead of itself when discussing the special counsel’s conclusions, ending up sounding like the 'fake news' the author and Trump both purport to abhor." Annalisa Quinn wrote in NPR online that "Along the way, [Levin] looks at The New York Times' inadequate coverage of the Holocaust (full disclosure: I write freelance pieces for the Times), and touches on a handful of clear problems in American media, from the often poor distinction between reporting and opinion to the distorting incentives of the Internet." Quinn continued, "But the book is largely filler. Quotations and paraphrasing make up the majority of the book's central chapters. Lengthy and irrelevant block quotes from historians about, say, colonial printing practices... give the book the air of a padded student essay." Quinn also wrote, "[Levin] conducts no interviews, presents no original research, and visits no newsrooms", and "When Levin does offer his own analysis, it can approach parody."

---

The book has no choice but to be a hack job because the opinions it proffers have no factual support, so Levin is forced to make it up.--Percy

This is political bigotry empty of thought and facts. 'Nuf said.--Percy

Indeed. You also seem to have forgotten how to cut-n-paste a nested quote. While there is no real discussion from you, there is plenty of real news. Really? Trump didn't go to India, speak at a rally, and tour the Taj Mahal? The coronavirus isn't causing a great deal of concern as it spreads worldwide? There wasn't a Democratic debate in South Carolina Tuesday night? The House didn't pass an anti-lynching bill? There wasn't a mass shooting in Milwaukee today? Weinstein wasn't found guilty? That's what's been in the news lately. Where is there anything leftist in any of that news? You're still confusing news with opinion.--Percy

Until you can show it this is still just mindless, fact-free babble. No you don't. If you saw it everyday then you could post links to it every day, but you don't because you can't because it doesn't exist and you're making it up. Not once. There does seem no escaping your unthinking, baseless litany. You continue to confuse news and opinion.--Percy

When are you going to show they're slanted? You've never produced any slanted headlines. I posted a bunch of headlines about the Trump Phoenix rally (thereby proving your claim wrong that the mainstream media doesn't report about Trump rallies) and you called them slanted. I showed that everything in the headlines was accurate and you had no answer. Care to try again? Here are those headlines again: You must first show how your claims have any basis in fact. The irony is strong in this one. You're making uninformed accusations. DWise1 gave you a link (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEuOPcbWoKs). Either ask DWise1 to support his claim that Maddow's show is based on hard facts or say nothing, but don't make stuff up. Yeah, sure, Trump's not corrupt. That's why he had no problem making his tax returns public. No one's asking you to accept headlines as gospel truth. We're asking you to inform yourself before putting fingers in gear. Trump didn't commit violations of the law but of the Constitution itself, the very foundation of our law. He attempted to coerce a foreign power to interfere in his favor in an American election, and he obstructed Congress in its investigation of same. She'd probably remind you that the defense already knew the juror's background and didn't use a challenge on her, and that Trump casts insults at every judge whose rulings he doesn't like, and that even Attorney General William Barr wishes Trump would stop tweeting such things. Can you provide us some quotes of this brilliance? You could try informing yourself and include that information in your posts. Such predictions are oh for the last two thousand years.--Percy

I'm talking about news, not headlines. That means actually reading the articles. Here are some links to the news I just listed, you tell us the leftist bias:

• ‘America Loves India,’ Trump Declares at Rally With Modi - The New York Times
• Trump, first lady stroll the grounds of iconic Taj Mahal
  
• Mapping the spread of the new coronavirus
  
• Page No Longer Available - The New York Times
• Harvey Weinstein guilty on two charges, acquitted on others in New York sexual assault case
  
• House Passes Bill to Make Lynching a Federal Crime - The New York Times

--Percy

That's all you ever do is repeat what you said. You once again merely wrote the same words over and over again while not saying anything true or based upon fact. Here's your chance at a redo.--Percy

All of it is your fault, and it's not because you don't do enough research, it's that you don't do any. That's why all your posts are fact free zones.Trump attempted to coerce a foreign power to interfere in his favor in an American election, and he obstructed Congress in its investigation of same. You never gone beyond, in effect, "No he didn't." Try a redo. You can start with the testimony before the House Intelligence Committee.--Percy

Yes he did. That is right-wing spin on an unconstitutional coercion of a foreign leader for help in the election. And there is such a thing as obstructing Congress, especially when Congress is trying to carry out its part of the constitutional responsibility of checks and balances.Percy

Because your posts are just mindless boilerplate full of factual errors, one can just do word substitution to generate a reply while inserting facts that are actually true: Trump had and has great need for help in the election and the whole idea that he doesn't is utterly screamingly ridiculous. Biden was the most likely candidate and Trump fears losing the election to the Democrats. Looking for some kind of dirt is just what he always does. It was Trump who paid off porn stars and paramours and totally invented accusations on his political opponents, such as the lie that Biden's son was under investigation in the Ukraine for corruption and that Biden paid to get him off. Biden did no such thing. The Right always dumps its own corruptions onto the Democrats. Trump was asking for help corrupting our election because that's who he his. The rest is Rightist lies and lies and more lies.--Percy