|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Right Side of the News | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: Trump definitely abused his powerM and certainly engaged in his usual obstruction of justice. the GAO ruled that he exceeded his power. There is no doubt about that. Of the others, the few violations that have been shown are minor. And you really haven’t shown that Biden broke the law. The Democrats in the House did not lie. That was you and the Republicans. As usual you call truths you want suppressed lies - one of those nasty little habits that exposes your true allegiance.
quote: More accurately you can’t discuss it. You lie and you lie and you lie and then complain when you aren’t believed.
quote: The results are bad for you because you oppose the truth, and obviously so. Just looking for evil lies won’t help you. We don’t love them the way you do.
quote: And that’s your tribalism right there.
quote: You are the problem, your irrationality, your tribalism, your love of slander.. I don’t see much hope of fixing that after all these years. Christianity claims to have a solution. Maybe you should try it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
Apparently Trump wants Pence to take charge of the coronavirus response because of his handling of an HIV outbreak in Indiana.
So, completely unnecessary outbreaks and deaths - but he can be eventually pressured into taking some action. Not exactly a recommendation on my book, but maybe Trump thinks it is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: Have you considered that if you have to go to biased and unreliable sources to hear something, it probably isn’t true? For example Ars Technica quote: Refusing to do anything about it until he was pressured into taking action ? I already covered that Message 5100 Edited by PaulK, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: I guess that you live refusing to let people into the country but that’s hardly the only precaution to take, and decimating the CDC was probably not a good idea.
quote: Which was partisan only because the Republicans are - almost all - fine when one of their own abuses power.
quote: It was Thursday. It was in the news.
quote: Pence needed to be pressured into allowing needle exchange programs. Let’s hope he isn’t equally bad with coronavirus.
quote: By which you mean that you prefer them because they are more biased and less objective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: Really ? In 2018 the Trump administration fired the pandemic response team and they haven’t been replaced. And he cut the CDC’s funding for controlling potential pandemics in other countries - which could stop them before they reach the US.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
At CPAC, Glenn Beck says the Bernie Sanders revolution will lead to another Holocaust (Media Matters)
Let’s not forget that Bernie Sanders is Jewish.
And, please, let us stop calling them Bernie bros. Because they are not my brother. They are not something that is funny. They are Bernie Bolsheviks. They are Bernie Brownshirts. That’s what they are. And their revolution will result in death and misery. Another Holodomor. Or another Holocaust. Or whatever we call the next great socialist atrocity.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: If they were, Joe Biden wouldn’t be leading the race to take on Trump.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
Sorry, but everyone near the centre is a communist is just silly.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: Well, your brain is the sort that labels anyone who doesn’t support Trump as a leftist. Even a right-wing extremist. The sort of brain that jumps from a man claiming that he hasn’t eaten in 66 years to the idea that he is a demon-possessed corpse without any consideration of the alternatives. The sort of brain that says it’s normal for the President to ignore all the usual channels and send his personal lawyer in to demand investigations of daft conspiracy theories (but only if he’s a Republican - if he’s a Democrat you’d be making up stuff to make it look even worse)
quote: You mean a planet where obviously false right-wing propaganda isn’t automatically believed. That’s this one.
quote: I’d suggest that actually thinking is a rather more important part of it. It doesn’t take much to notice that the Democratic Party has a range of views and that the establishment Democrats are well to the right of Bernie Sanders. Who isn’t a communist.
quote: The difference is that we have real evidence.
quote: I think that my points above shed considerable light on the matter. You won’t accept that, though because you don’t like the truth.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: And thus I am proven correct. Unable to refute any of my points you just reject them because they contradict your fantasy. As I predicted.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: But you only want an answer you’d like - and the truth isn’t it. You don’t want the irrationality, the prejudice or the tribalism in your thinking exposed.
quote: It certainly requires a respect for the facts. And it seems you don’t have that. Try these facts. The Democratic Party contains a range of views. The establishment Democrats are centrist. They are opposing the left-wing candidates like Sanders.
quote: If what you have in mind is genuine understanding it isn’t going to happen with you. Not unless you’re prepared change and to accept the facts.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: You’re too busy hating us to understand. And too proud to acknowledge the problems in your own thinking even when they are blindingly obvious. You’re only proving my point - the biggest problem is you.
quote: Much of what I am saying is fact, not opinion. Can’t you even acknowledge that ?
quote: And it isn’t possible because you refuse to be reasonable. That’s on you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5
|
quote: Sure they can. If they rig the system through gerrymandering and voter suppression - and get an advantage through the Electoral College the Republicans can get the Presidency and both Houses of Congress, all with a minority of voters (and a smaller proportion of the electorate). And that’s what they want.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: The Electoral College decides the Presidency, and a minority vote did win it. If that is added to control of Congress by a minority there is a very serious problem. At the least the issues I raise are important context. And there are obvious problems with the Electoral College., such as the winner-takes-all States. Not to mention the interesting fact that one of the reasons it was chosen was because of slavery - where the South had a large population without voting rights. If things had been otherwise the Founders might have decided differently. I think there is at least a case for insisting that each State’s Electors are divided proportionately instead of winner-takes-all, which would make every State worth some effort.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.5 |
quote: Then you aren’t reading it correctly (what a surprise). It’s about calling people or groups Marxist or Communist in order to discredit them (whether it is true or not). And you are a fan of real censorship anyway.
quote: I suppose it can be used as an attempt to discredit opinions, but not when it is used correctly to point out that an argument is flawed. Of course the abuse often comes from Christian apologists. But calling an argument a logical fallacy is certainly better than calling an idea Communist to discredit it. So if you really believed that you would have to say that red-baiting is a form of censorship. And in this case simply calling someone a Marxist or Communist without any regard for the truth - solely to demonise them - is much worse than a valid opinion.
quote: It’s pretty obvious that it’s the demonisation of opponents that has the dangerous political motive - not the opposition to it.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024