|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: I Know That God Does Not Exist | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Sarah Bellum writes:
A direct answer would fill in the blanks as I asked you to do. It is becoming pretty clear that you can't do it. If you're not going to respond to my argument, at least tell me what, in your opinion, is insufficiently direct in my post?All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Stile writes:
The fact that there are places we haven't looked.
Again - what is the evidence leading us to think God could exist somewhere we don't know about? Stile writes:
I don't care if you alter your conclusions. Most of us seem to recognize already that your conclusions are wrong. I'm just adding my two cents to the reasons why they are wrong. If you can rationally answer this contradiction in your claims of knowledge - then I will need to adjust my conclusions.All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
Yes.
1. Do you understand the post I've copied below? ________ (Yes or No) Sarah Bellum writes:
Of course I disagree and I've already explained why. Nothing in that post shows irrational thinking, which is why I keep asking you to point out exactly what is irrational about it. 2. Do you disagree with the post I've copied below? ________ (Yes / No / Don't understand the post) An idea you don't like is not necessarily irrational. An idea that is flat-out wrong is not necessarily irrational. An idea that is unfalsifiable is not necessarily irrational. So, will you finally debate in good faith and answer my question?All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
I think I could say I know it, based on the concept of "know" that I have been using. I could show you a stuffed passenger pigeon or a skeleton. Would you say that you know that at some time in the past passenger pigeons existed?You might, but you couldn't know for certain, could you? All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
Proving or disproving an idea depends on evidence - i.e. premises - not on reasoning about the idea itself.
First of all, an idea that is not falsifiable cannot be established (or disproved) by reasoning. Sarah Bellum writes:
What might clear things up is if you would answer the question that I keep asking you: What is it, specifically, that is irrational about the idea of God? List the errors in reasoning and explain why each is an error. I hope that clears things up for you.All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
Let's try a different tack: While the concept of falsifiability depends on evidence.... In your world, is the idea of beauty rational or irrational? Can you falsify the idea of beauty? Is the idea of love rational or irrational? Can you falsify the idea of love?All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
It doesn't make any difference whether or not anything was faked. The Hitler diaries might have been faked but that doesn't mean that the idea of Hitler diaries is irrational. But still, all that could have been faked, couldn't it? I can say I know that passenger pigeons once existed because there is evidence. I can not say I know something based on a lack of evidence.All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Stile writes:
Don't be silly. There's the cake, right in front of you. You don't have to look for it at all.
But there are places we haven't looked to verify that you can bake a cake. Stile writes:
I am demonstrating to you that I can bake a cake. It isn't likely to be in both of our imaginations at the same time. We can add as many witnesses as you like to make it as objective as you like.
What if we go to one of those places and realize that you only think you've been baking a cake all this time.... Stile writes:
We have to look in enough places. If you can't find skarkfin soup on the McDonalds menu, you can't say that you know sharkfin soup doesn't exist. You haven't looked in enough places. The fact is... we don't have to look in all places.Because our knowledge isn't based on absolutes. All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
I don't even care whether the idea of a deity is rational or not. But it's interesting that you can't show us exactly what is irrational about it. It appears ringo desperately wants to say that there is something rational about the idea of a deity....All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
I think it's a good sign that we're not just taking sides. Tangle and I have disagreed with each other too on many occasions. Im amazed, by the way that ringo and Tangle are actually supporting the argument of a believer!All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
Don't kid yourself. You're not off the hook yet. I'm still waiting for an answer to my question and until you provide one I'm going to continue pointing out that you can't.
... you were getting rather tedious. Sarah Bellum writes:
What's the difference with God?
People may differ in their opinions as to what is beautiful and what is not, but that doesn't mean there is no space for rational discussion on the subject, as one person may persuade another about reasons that a particular thing might be considered beautiful - giving them insights, as it were. Sarah Bellum writes:
The question was: Is it a rational idea or an irrational idea? And can it be falsified? As for love, emotions are not well understood by science and, who knows, may never be. But it's possible there is some evolutionary, rational, element to that particular emotion. On the other hand, it may just be an incidental side effect in the development of the complex human brain.All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
Not at all. It's like looking into an empty peanut butter jar and saying I'll have to look elsewhere for peanut butter. That's like looking into an empty peanut butter jar and saying you cannot say the jar is empty because all your evidence is merely evidence of a lack of peanut butter!All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
I couldn't care less about your opinion. I've been asking you for facts. I've shown you my opinion.All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Stile writes:
Now you're just being dishonest. You know that argument works for what you can see but not for what you can't.
Don't be silly. There's no God, right in front of you. You don't have to look for Him at all. Stile writes:
You can't "demonstrate" a negative like that.
I am demonstrating to you that God does not exist. Stile writes:
Nope. Not near enough. You haven't looked behind the dark matter yet.
Enough = rational places rationally tested according to the rational information available to us.Done. For the last few thousand years. Stile writes:
It's exactly the same argument though. You didn't find sharkfin soup where you looked. You didn't find God where you looked. But you looked in the wrong place for sharkfin soup. Who's to say you're not looking in the wrong place for God?
I'm not saying I know sharkfin soup doesn't exist. Stile writes:
The same reason we have for suggesting that sharkfinsoup may exist somewhere else besides McDonalds. What rational reason do you have to suggest that God may exist in another rational location?All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Sarah Bellum writes:
This is a discussion forum, not a pop quiz. We expect a little more than, "I already answered that." Elaborate.
You asked about beauty and I answered. Sarah Bellum writes:
I'm trying to figure out what you think a rational idea is - but you resolutely refuse to answer, so I can't help but think you haven't thought it through.
What connection are you making with a deity? Sarah Bellum writes:
Use any definition that your little heart desires. I'm asking why you think the idea of God is irrational, so your definition is more relevant than mine.
And, incidentally, what is your definition of "god"? We can't talk about it unless you tell us what you mean. Sarah Bellum writes:
We're not talking about any "statement". We're talking about the idea of God. You're the one who brought up falsification as a supposed argument that the idea of God is irrational. So tell us how you would falsify the idea of God or drop the argument about falsification. As for "falsification" what is the statement about love that you are wondering whether or not can be falsified?All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024