Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   I Know That God Does Not Exist
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


(1)
Message 1553 of 3207 (859315)
07-30-2019 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 1546 by Sarah Bellum
07-30-2019 1:46 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
If you're not going to respond to my argument, at least tell me what, in your opinion, is insufficiently direct in my post?
A direct answer would fill in the blanks as I asked you to do. It is becoming pretty clear that you can't do it.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1546 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 1:46 PM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1555 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 6:02 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1554 of 3207 (859316)
07-30-2019 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 1547 by Stile
07-30-2019 1:46 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Stile writes:
Again - what is the evidence leading us to think God could exist somewhere we don't know about?
The fact that there are places we haven't looked.
Stile writes:
If you can rationally answer this contradiction in your claims of knowledge - then I will need to adjust my conclusions.
I don't care if you alter your conclusions. Most of us seem to recognize already that your conclusions are wrong. I'm just adding my two cents to the reasons why they are wrong.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1547 by Stile, posted 07-30-2019 1:46 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1572 by Stile, posted 07-31-2019 8:51 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1558 of 3207 (859322)
07-30-2019 6:13 PM
Reply to: Message 1555 by Sarah Bellum
07-30-2019 6:02 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
1. Do you understand the post I've copied below? ________ (Yes or No)
Yes.
Sarah Bellum writes:
2. Do you disagree with the post I've copied below? ________ (Yes / No / Don't understand the post)
Of course I disagree and I've already explained why. Nothing in that post shows irrational thinking, which is why I keep asking you to point out exactly what is irrational about it.
An idea you don't like is not necessarily irrational. An idea that is flat-out wrong is not necessarily irrational. An idea that is unfalsifiable is not necessarily irrational.
So, will you finally debate in good faith and answer my question?

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1555 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 6:02 PM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1561 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 6:41 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1560 of 3207 (859324)
07-30-2019 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 1559 by Sarah Bellum
07-30-2019 6:14 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
Would you say that you know that at some time in the past passenger pigeons existed?
You might, but you couldn't know for certain, could you?
I think I could say I know it, based on the concept of "know" that I have been using. I could show you a stuffed passenger pigeon or a skeleton.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1559 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 6:14 PM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1565 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 8:49 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1562 of 3207 (859327)
07-30-2019 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 1561 by Sarah Bellum
07-30-2019 6:41 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
First of all, an idea that is not falsifiable cannot be established (or disproved) by reasoning.
Proving or disproving an idea depends on evidence - i.e. premises - not on reasoning about the idea itself.
Sarah Bellum writes:
I hope that clears things up for you.
What might clear things up is if you would answer the question that I keep asking you: What is it, specifically, that is irrational about the idea of God? List the errors in reasoning and explain why each is an error.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1561 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 6:41 PM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1564 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 8:44 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1581 of 3207 (859352)
07-31-2019 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1564 by Sarah Bellum
07-30-2019 8:44 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
While the concept of falsifiability depends on evidence....
Let's try a different tack:
In your world, is the idea of beauty rational or irrational? Can you falsify the idea of beauty? Is the idea of love rational or irrational? Can you falsify the idea of love?

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1564 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 8:44 PM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1589 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 11:27 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1586 of 3207 (859357)
07-31-2019 11:17 AM
Reply to: Message 1565 by Sarah Bellum
07-30-2019 8:49 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
But still, all that could have been faked, couldn't it?
It doesn't make any difference whether or not anything was faked. The Hitler diaries might have been faked but that doesn't mean that the idea of Hitler diaries is irrational.
I can say I know that passenger pigeons once existed because there is evidence. I can not say I know something based on a lack of evidence.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1565 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 8:49 PM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1590 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 11:29 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1588 of 3207 (859359)
07-31-2019 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 1572 by Stile
07-31-2019 8:51 AM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Stile writes:
But there are places we haven't looked to verify that you can bake a cake.
Don't be silly. There's the cake, right in front of you. You don't have to look for it at all.
Stile writes:
What if we go to one of those places and realize that you only think you've been baking a cake all this time....
I am demonstrating to you that I can bake a cake. It isn't likely to be in both of our imaginations at the same time. We can add as many witnesses as you like to make it as objective as you like.
Stile writes:
The fact is... we don't have to look in all places.
Because our knowledge isn't based on absolutes.
We have to look in enough places. If you can't find skarkfin soup on the McDonalds menu, you can't say that you know sharkfin soup doesn't exist. You haven't looked in enough places.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1572 by Stile, posted 07-31-2019 8:51 AM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1601 by Stile, posted 07-31-2019 12:26 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1591 of 3207 (859362)
07-31-2019 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 1566 by Sarah Bellum
07-30-2019 8:53 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
It appears ringo desperately wants to say that there is something rational about the idea of a deity....
I don't even care whether the idea of a deity is rational or not. But it's interesting that you can't show us exactly what is irrational about it.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1566 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-30-2019 8:53 PM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1592 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 11:31 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1596 of 3207 (859367)
07-31-2019 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 1567 by Phat
07-30-2019 9:40 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Phat writes:
Im amazed, by the way that ringo and Tangle are actually supporting the argument of a believer!
I think it's a good sign that we're not just taking sides. Tangle and I have disagreed with each other too on many occasions.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1567 by Phat, posted 07-30-2019 9:40 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1597 of 3207 (859368)
07-31-2019 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 1589 by Sarah Bellum
07-31-2019 11:27 AM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
... you were getting rather tedious.
Don't kid yourself. You're not off the hook yet. I'm still waiting for an answer to my question and until you provide one I'm going to continue pointing out that you can't.
Sarah Bellum writes:
People may differ in their opinions as to what is beautiful and what is not, but that doesn't mean there is no space for rational discussion on the subject, as one person may persuade another about reasons that a particular thing might be considered beautiful - giving them insights, as it were.
What's the difference with God?
Sarah Bellum writes:
As for love, emotions are not well understood by science and, who knows, may never be. But it's possible there is some evolutionary, rational, element to that particular emotion. On the other hand, it may just be an incidental side effect in the development of the complex human brain.
The question was: Is it a rational idea or an irrational idea? And can it be falsified?

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1589 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 11:27 AM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1606 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 12:52 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1598 of 3207 (859369)
07-31-2019 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 1590 by Sarah Bellum
07-31-2019 11:29 AM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
That's like looking into an empty peanut butter jar and saying you cannot say the jar is empty because all your evidence is merely evidence of a lack of peanut butter!
Not at all. It's like looking into an empty peanut butter jar and saying I'll have to look elsewhere for peanut butter.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1590 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 11:29 AM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1607 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 12:53 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1599 of 3207 (859370)
07-31-2019 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 1592 by Sarah Bellum
07-31-2019 11:31 AM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
I've shown you my opinion.
I couldn't care less about your opinion. I've been asking you for facts.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1592 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 11:31 AM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1609 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 12:55 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1608 of 3207 (859379)
07-31-2019 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 1601 by Stile
07-31-2019 12:26 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Stile writes:
Don't be silly. There's no God, right in front of you. You don't have to look for Him at all.
Now you're just being dishonest. You know that argument works for what you can see but not for what you can't.
Stile writes:
I am demonstrating to you that God does not exist.
You can't "demonstrate" a negative like that.
Stile writes:
Enough = rational places rationally tested according to the rational information available to us.
Done. For the last few thousand years.
Nope. Not near enough. You haven't looked behind the dark matter yet.
Stile writes:
I'm not saying I know sharkfin soup doesn't exist.
It's exactly the same argument though. You didn't find sharkfin soup where you looked. You didn't find God where you looked. But you looked in the wrong place for sharkfin soup. Who's to say you're not looking in the wrong place for God?
Stile writes:
What rational reason do you have to suggest that God may exist in another rational location?
The same reason we have for suggesting that sharkfinsoup may exist somewhere else besides McDonalds.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1601 by Stile, posted 07-31-2019 12:26 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1613 by Stile, posted 07-31-2019 1:15 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 442 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1611 of 3207 (859382)
07-31-2019 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1606 by Sarah Bellum
07-31-2019 12:52 PM


Re: No evidence = irrational
Sarah Bellum writes:
You asked about beauty and I answered.
This is a discussion forum, not a pop quiz. We expect a little more than, "I already answered that." Elaborate.
Sarah Bellum writes:
What connection are you making with a deity?
I'm trying to figure out what you think a rational idea is - but you resolutely refuse to answer, so I can't help but think you haven't thought it through.
Sarah Bellum writes:
And, incidentally, what is your definition of "god"? We can't talk about it unless you tell us what you mean.
Use any definition that your little heart desires. I'm asking why you think the idea of God is irrational, so your definition is more relevant than mine.
Sarah Bellum writes:
As for "falsification" what is the statement about love that you are wondering whether or not can be falsified?
We're not talking about any "statement". We're talking about the idea of God. You're the one who brought up falsification as a supposed argument that the idea of God is irrational. So tell us how you would falsify the idea of God or drop the argument about falsification.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1606 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 12:52 PM Sarah Bellum has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1617 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-31-2019 1:29 PM ringo has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024