xongsmith writes:
I'm sorry. I know there are protocols & rules of politeness, but
I just can't feel good about Petrophysics booing you on this story.
What kind of hard ass would boo this story?
Really Petro?
Well maybe I read the story.
First part is about Ramoss's sister.We are told she can't get medication for over three months. Why does that kick up a red flag for me? Well if a person receives a controlled pain substance they cannot receive over a three month supply of that drug. My friend Dan has a pain medication for a clot in his right leg, he can only get 70 pills to last him 3 months. The reason for this is because the doctor and his insurance (the gov't at present) don't want him addicted to or totally reliant upon this controlled substance.
Is Ramoss telling us the whole truth here? I don't think so.
So now let's go to the tearfull story about Ramoss's niece.
Suppose I was walking across the street at a crosswalk, and I was totally competent, not intoxicated in any way. You hit me with your car and you are at fault. Do I need health insurance?
No, because you ARE going to pay for everything because you injured me. I AM GOING TO OWN YOUR HOUSE.
I know this and this does not match with what Ramoss told us.
So is the world true as I see it or is Ramoss not telling us the entire truth?
So I have come to the conclusion Ramoss is not telling the truth so he gets a Boo/jeer.
If you don't like it too bad!
From petrophysics a Tea Party supporter.