Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Awesome Republican Primary Thread
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9201
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 1096 of 1485 (709754)
10-29-2013 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 1095 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 5:17 PM


And you also havent explained how an informational picket would be extortion and put your cousin out of business before it he even starts his business.
Fearmongering anecdotes. Nothing more.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1095 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 5:17 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1097 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 5:26 PM Theodoric has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 1097 of 1485 (709755)
10-29-2013 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 1096 by Theodoric
10-29-2013 5:21 PM


And you also havent explained how an informational picket would be extortion and put your cousin out of business before it he even starts his business.
The town has a lot of union workers living in it and if it got picketed then they probably wouldn't patronize him.
Its like extortion because we either have to pay their higher price or face the threat of damaging the business.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1096 by Theodoric, posted 10-29-2013 5:21 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1098 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-29-2013 5:33 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 1102 by Theodoric, posted 10-29-2013 5:53 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 1108 by Rahvin, posted 10-29-2013 6:47 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 1098 of 1485 (709757)
10-29-2013 5:33 PM
Reply to: Message 1097 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 5:26 PM


The town has a lot of union workers living in it and if it got picketed then they probably wouldn't patronize him.
Its like extortion because we either have to pay their higher price or face the threat of damaging the business.
And surgery is like murder because it involves stabbing people with knives.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1097 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 5:26 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1099 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 5:40 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 1099 of 1485 (709758)
10-29-2013 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 1098 by Dr Adequate
10-29-2013 5:33 PM


Wow.
Such clever.
Much funny.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1098 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-29-2013 5:33 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10085
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.1


(1)
Message 1100 of 1485 (709759)
10-29-2013 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 1088 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 1:25 PM


But you've moved from company policy (32 hours = benefits) to a federally mandated policy. The resulting chopping of hours is, actually, due to the federal mandate and not company policy. So its right to blame that on Obamacare (and the dirty companies that would do that to their workers).
Do you have any data showing that there has been any significant movement of workers from full time to part time as a result of the ACA?
The data I have seen shows just the opposite:
"The report's most notable nugget is the change in part-time work. Over the last month the number of workers in part-time jobs for economic reasons--slack demand, cutbacks in hours--has remained stable. Over the last year, however, it has fallen by 681,000. Those part-timers also constitute a smaller share of all workers--5.5% in September compared to 6% a year earlier."
Tuesday's tepid brew of jobs data, delayed more than two weeks by the government shutdown, wasn't worth waiting for.
Part time jobs are going down while full time jobs are increasing. I think you are swallowing Republican lies without questioning them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1088 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 1:25 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1103 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 6:03 PM Taq has replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 335 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 1101 of 1485 (709760)
10-29-2013 5:53 PM
Reply to: Message 1078 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 10:53 AM


My cousin is starting up a business. He bought a steel building that has to be built. The company that sold him the building said they would charge him $44,000 to construct it. He shopped around for other prices, including some unions. The cost the unions bid was $66,000 - $77,000. He told me that there's no way he could afford that much. Now, our other friend who works for the union is telling him to be careful because if the union finds out that he goes non-union, then they'll probably picket his new business. The town it's in has a lot of union workers and that could really ruin his business.
We asked: "Well, can't he just build it himself?" Isn't a man allowed to build his own building on his own property without the union bullying him? They said that that would probably be okay. Then I said, well what if I helped him out for free? We're family. Can't a guy and his family build a building? Hmm, probably still okay. (Geez, I can't believe we have to get permission for this). We went further: what if we have a non-family friend that helps for free. "Hmm, that's probably pushing it, they said".
That's just retardiculous, in my arrogant opinion.
Well technically that is what unions do protect the workers so they don't have to undersell their work, the only option they have is to picket your cousins buisnes, if he hires workers that do the job cheaper.
This all goes back to the times when workers worked 16 hour days, and if the whole family worked including the children they would scrape enough together so they can eat and have a roof over their heads. Workers banned together and said we wont work for such measly wages and the fat cats had to eventually give in.
You cousin buying cheap labour is a threat to the working man's wage.
A story just came out today when an immigrant was working for a building company at the end of the weak after begging for his sallery his boss threw him 5 EURo like he would to a dog. how do you know the contractor you want to hire do sent do the same to his workers.

Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand
What are the Christians gonna do to me ..... Forgive me, good luck with that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1078 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 10:53 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9201
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 1102 of 1485 (709761)
10-29-2013 5:53 PM
Reply to: Message 1097 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 5:26 PM


face the threat of damaging the business.
Still waiting. How does an informational picket destroy their business? Because it would make union people think twice about patronizing the business. You do know that is how a free market system works don't you?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1097 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 5:26 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 1103 of 1485 (709763)
10-29-2013 6:03 PM
Reply to: Message 1100 by Taq
10-29-2013 5:46 PM


Do you have any data showing that there has been any significant movement of workers from full time to part time as a result of the ACA?
No. I was talking about friends of mine whose employers are telling them that they are going to be cutting their hours when the law goes into effect in January. I see in a previous message that I didn't use the future tense properly, I didn't mean to say that their hours have already been cut.
The data I have seen shows just the opposite:
Let's look again in February.
I think you are swallowing Republican lies without questioning them.
Nah, I'm not hearing this from Republicans. I really don't listen to mass media.
I've just gotten these anecdotes from friends of mine in real life. These are people who do things like waiting tables and are already working less than full time. They're just being told that the owner is thinking about making them work at most 29 hours per week so they avoid the employer mandate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1100 by Taq, posted 10-29-2013 5:46 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1104 by frako, posted 10-29-2013 6:07 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 1105 by Taq, posted 10-29-2013 6:15 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 1106 by Theodoric, posted 10-29-2013 6:25 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
frako
Member (Idle past 335 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


Message 1104 of 1485 (709764)
10-29-2013 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 1103 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 6:03 PM


I've just gotten these anecdotes from friends of mine in real life. These are people who do things like waiting tables and are already working less than full time. They're just being told that the owner is thinking about making them work at most 29 hours per week so they avoid the employer mandate.
Yea but think of what that will do to unemployment rates when so many new jobs are going to be opened so the employers can have the work they need done.

Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand
What are the Christians gonna do to me ..... Forgive me, good luck with that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1103 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 6:03 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10085
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.1


(1)
Message 1105 of 1485 (709765)
10-29-2013 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 1103 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 6:03 PM


No. I was talking about friends of mine whose employers are telling them that they are going to be cutting their hours when the law goes into effect in January.
The mandate for employers does not go into effect until January 2015.
White House To Delay Obamacare's Employer Mandate Until 2015; Far-Reaching Implications For The Private Health Insurance Market
The national trend is that part time jobs are becoming less common while there is a rise in full time jobs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1103 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 6:03 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9201
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


(2)
Message 1106 of 1485 (709767)
10-29-2013 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 1103 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 6:03 PM


I was talking about friends of mine whose employers are telling them that they are going to be cutting their hours when the law goes into effect in January.
More bullshit form someone because the law does not go into effect until Jan 1, 2015.
The purpose of the law is shared responsibility. It is funny that the conservatives are all for personal responsibility until it is them that is expected to be responsible. People less than full time will probably be able to get as good a deal for insurance than what they could from an employer.
This will shake out a lot of piss poor business people that believe that their employees are chattel. I am already seeing pushback on employers pulling crap like you are talking about. The employees are finding better employers and customers are voting with their dollars. An employer that acts in the manner you are describing is going to be destroyed by public opinion. Walmart is seeing some of that backlash now.
ABE
Also, they have to have over 50 full time employees to even be affected.
Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1103 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 6:03 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1533 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


(5)
Message 1107 of 1485 (709768)
10-29-2013 6:33 PM


I heard that when Obama care kicks anyone over the age 65 will be euthanized in death camps.
I also heard that we will have to pay for illegal immigrants to come over here and have babies.
I also heard that small business owner will be forced into forclosure.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

Replies to this message:
 Message 1111 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-30-2013 12:28 AM 1.61803 has not replied
 Message 1113 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-30-2013 10:21 AM 1.61803 has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 7.6


Message 1108 of 1485 (709769)
10-29-2013 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1097 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 5:26 PM


The town has a lot of union workers living in it and if it got picketed then they probably wouldn't patronize him.
Its like extortion because we either have to pay their higher price or face the threat of damaging the business.
Here in Sacramento, we have a grocery chain that doesn't hire union workers. Basically, their prices are a little lower, in part because they don't hire any baggers, the customers bag their own groceries.
I don't know if it's still going on, but for a very long time there would be frequent picketers from the grocer's union on the sidewalk outside of the grocer's property at at least one of the locations. I saw it several times over several months (eventually I moved out of that area).
The picket was small. Most union members had jobs - a picket like this isn't like a strike, where the workers at a business all leave their normal jobs to picket instead.
I think your relative may be more concerned than he/she should be about a potential union picket. And don't forget - just as the freedom of speech allows the unions to picket him as a non-union-supporter, he also has the right to put someone outside his business, or place a sign on his own property, openly displaying the price differences between quotes from the union vs non-union shops. Potential customers may be less likely to care about the union's protestations when they can immediately see that their prices were so drastically higher.

The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it. - Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
A world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But, on the other hand, in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity. — Albert Camus
"...the pious hope that by combining numerous little turds of variously tainted data, one can obtain a valuable result; but in fact, the outcome is merely a larger than average pile of shit." - Barash, David 1995...
"Many that live deserve death. And some die that deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then be not too eager to deal out death in the name of justice, fearing for your own safety. Even the wise cannot see all ends." - Gandalf, J. R. R. Tolkien: The Lord Of the Rings
Nihil supernum

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1097 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 5:26 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1109 by Theodoric, posted 10-29-2013 8:24 PM Rahvin has not replied
 Message 1112 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-30-2013 10:17 AM Rahvin has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9201
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 1109 of 1485 (709772)
10-29-2013 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 1108 by Rahvin
10-29-2013 6:47 PM


Potential customers may be less likely to care about the union's protestations when they can immediately see that their prices were so drastically higher.
But we don't know they were. He mentions a price from the people that are supplying the building and prices from "the union". No prices mentioned from a non-union shop at all. All CS is doing is trying to spread anti-union propaganda and he has provided no reasonable detail at all. That he thinks "the unions" priced the job speaks volumes. He makes it sound like multiple unions gave bids on the job. So did his cousin get a bid from the Steelworkers, one from the Teamsters and another from IBEW. Come on, the whole story is just a sad attempt to bash unions and the ACA.
Anyone that buys a steel building and does not use a contractor certified by the manufacturer is asking for trouble.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1108 by Rahvin, posted 10-29-2013 6:47 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1115 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-30-2013 10:40 AM Theodoric has replied

  
yenmor
Member (Idle past 3685 days)
Posts: 145
Joined: 07-01-2013


(2)
Message 1110 of 1485 (709774)
10-29-2013 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 1078 by New Cat's Eye
10-29-2013 10:53 AM


Hello CS again. Just got home from work after another 13 hour day here. We managed to get a lot done. Today, I was on site of a construction project for a new police investigation facility. I told myself that by the end of the day I'd sign my name in the concrete where nobody would notice. But I managed to forget. I only remembered while driving home from work. Anyway, I guess I'll do it next time I'm out there again.
CS writes:
I know people who's hours are being cut to 29 per week as that is the maximum they can work before their employer has to provide them with insurance, iirc. I know a guy who is trying to go from an hourly wage for 40 hours per week to a salaried position at 29 hours per week for whatever pay it has to be to equal what he makes at his current wage over 40 hours. Then he'll put in the same amount of time for the same pay, but it'll look like he's only working 29 hours and his employer won't have to pay for his insurance (they're telling him that they can't afford it and are looking at options).
I'm really trying to understand this from your perspective. But you're making it hard for me, considering every time you try to present "evidence" to support your dislike of Obama and Obamacare, you only managed to show your misunderstanding and, sometimes, downright ignorance of the new law.
The employer mandate won't go into effect until 2015. Your example is a perfect example of the boogie man fairy tale I was talking about before. Employers of low skilled workers love to do this. They always try to find a boogie man to blame for what they want to do. Low skilled workers usually are not as well educated and so they will believe anything their employers tell them.
In your particular case, the employer thought cutting down the hours of their employees will give the company the most benefits. But to keep the workers from making too much fuss about it, they blame it on Obamacare.
Same with insurance companies cutting benefits and raising premiums.
My cousin is starting up a business. He bought a steel building that has to be built. The company that sold him the building said they would charge him $44,000 to construct it. He shopped around for other prices, including some unions. The cost the unions bid was $66,000 - $77,000. He told me that there's no way he could afford that much. Now, our other friend who works for the union is telling him to be careful because if the union finds out that he goes non-union, then they'll probably picket his new business. The town it's in has a lot of union workers and that could really ruin his business.
We asked: "Well, can't he just build it himself?" Isn't a man allowed to build his own building on his own property without the union bullying him? They said that that would probably be okay. Then I said, well what if I helped him out for free? We're family. Can't a guy and his family build a building? Hmm, probably still okay. (Geez, I can't believe we have to get permission for this). We went further: what if we have a non-family friend that helps for free. "Hmm, that's probably pushing it, they said".
That's just retardiculous, in my arrogant opinion.
Several possibilities going on with this one here. Your cousin got misled. You got misled. Miscommunication between you and your cousin. Someone is pulling his leg. Someone is pulling your leg. Etc.
There's no reason to lie to me about my own feelings, there's no way that could work.
And yet pretty much everything you said in this message (message 1078) is factually not accurate.
No, I've tried that before and it doesn't work.
Well, just the fact that you believed the nonsense about employers having to cut hours to conform with Obamacare is telling enough that you never really tried. Again, the employer mandate won't go into effect until 2015.
My offer still stands. You try your best to defend Obamacare. I will try my best to argue against it. Deal?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1078 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-29-2013 10:53 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1114 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-30-2013 10:32 AM yenmor has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024