Evolution is clearly a scientific fact, it is also clearly a scientific fact that evolution can not happen without DNA to mutate and or combine DNA of both parent organisms, in order for evolution to happen.
I'm with ya.
Evolutionary theory does not explain where DNA came from, it can not.
Actually, the principles in the Theory of Evolution can be applied to pre-DNA molecules and offer some explanation. For example, the RNA world hypothesis:
involves random mutation and natural selection acting on RNA before DNA ever exists.
The key component to evolution that you need is imperfect replication, not necessarily actual DNA.
Now that said evolution is a wonderful thing as it allows the human race to, for instance produce better food crops, corn being one. If you could invent an organism or life process, that would adapt itself to changing conditions, and thereby improve itself over time, would you not do this?
Hypothetically speaking, you might worry that it would evolve past you. Kinda like how we're accidentally driving the evolution of more dangerous antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Sure you would, as this would free your time to do even more inventing, why must evolution and ID be totally separate?Why can evolution by DNA code changes, not be an engineered process?
It can/could definately be an engineered process. But ID makes no attempt to explain that.
If you have the answer, you are a fool
Oh
because at the moment, this answer is beyond the knowledge curve of the human race, yet so many know for sure what is true......! The only thing that you can truly be sure of, is that 99.9999 percent of all knowable knowledge, is unknown.
The question you seem to be asking, as opposed to "why not ID*", is why can't evolution be considered to be planned, like by God or something. The answer to that is that it can. Theistic Evolution is a thing.
*ID is a specific anti-evolution movement, not a general God-accepting approach to the question