Should we teach both evolution and religion in school?

When I mentioned the rules in my world, I was not talking about this forum, which is about .01 % of my day. And I play within those rules as far as I am able, knowing that I don't have any evidence for the majority which, if you really want to know, are not into what I post, and possibly cannot be because of their habits of thinking.
It is a lot easier for many to not engage the intellect and just debunk things.
They like to remain where they are, no changes.Edited by Colbard, : cough

My rules don't discourage individuality or inventiveness, but only the opposite.
You'll also notice that the internet did not evolve by itself. Kapow !

And if that valid rational is valid, but not to the readers, then according to your system it is not valid, and remains invalid until the rationality of the readers reaches a point where it can rationalize something which they could not before.Is that evolution and progress or what?

Having a whole lot of knowledge is great, and acceptable, but having a little bit of poo in science called the Theory of Evolution and its various offspring is not acceptable.It is possible to have a perverse observational skill due to a wrong idea in the first place. Science does not disprove Creationism at all, the false conclusions of brain washed men do. It depends on how one interprets the evidence.

IMO you are looking forward to leaning your unchallenged preconceived ideas into an area which you are sure will never change your mind, but hopefully annihilate the other. You are sealed by your own choices to remain where you are, and your input will be clearly predictable.

That answer is part of the evolution/atheist regime. The other half of America does science as well without imbibing swamp stories.

True, evolution is also a religion, the ancient religion of Baal worship, which is essentially humanism, the ideas of humanity above any revelation or God.

That's true.Firstly the 3,000 year old book is not wrong.
But you would have to prove which versions of the Bible are genuine, and what religions measure up to its standards. Virtually none.The reason there is confusion and schism out there, compared to relative uniformity in science, is because science demands rationality, however it is limited to the rationality of human beings.Religion is part of a conflict between Christ and Satan, of which all religions, both pagan and christian are practically under the guide of Satan who has masterminded the state of confusion, as well as the animosity between genuine science and matters of faith.It can be rationally proven in a few sentences from the Bible that every religion is false, yet many persuasions of Christendom claim this book as their guide.
It is a total farce that works well in favor continued ignorance.So in essence we have both science and religion divorcing people from God the creator. One through unbelief or humanism, the other through false doctrines or the doctrines of men - which is also humanism.Self worship is the key fault of the original apostate in heaven, and he has well succeeded in not only dragging a third of the angels with him, but the entire world.So really, we should not teach evolution or religion in school, but faith and reasoning.

Someone just complained that what I was saying was off topic, well I thought that if matters of faith were in the discussion surely its on topic.Faith should go hand in hand with reason. You learn the alphabet by faith, you reason out the applications in words.Science has gone on a tour after rejecting initial training in faith, so it cannot know the facts that have been established, but it is left to progress from where it started, from nothing.So to prove something from science which will take infinity to figure out, it can not be done. You ask for evidence for things that are obvious, but admit you are not interested because you are in a progress of getting it - your way, the slow way.
That's not how education works. You need both faith and reasoning.Your starting point is nature, the natural world. It is a gift of knowledge, it is full of intelligent things, which instead of leading you to the intelligent conclusion of gratitude to an obvious Maker and designer, you go down the path of doubt, analysis, dissections, postulations.
Then you have the gall to ask proof of others what you have rejected as evidence in the first place.You need to understand what balance is, before your blindness becomes totally incurable.

RAZDIn essence you are saying?That only what you think is valid?I don't mind an opinionated man, because at least he has one.

If there was a spiritual battle going on as I mentioned, then revelation would be most screwed with.I believe in the goodness of humanity too, but I'm wary of humanism.

You keep saying I am delusional, do you want it to stick or haven't you yet figured out that an insane person won't listen?
How sharp is your logic then?Do you have any evidence, logical evidence of course, for love?I have heard of weird relationships...No, we should teach faith (that works by love) and reasoning in school.Edited by Colbard, : spelling

This world, how is it going?If I lived in a world of death and dysfunction, and I was offered eternal life, I would take it even if I had no proof of it, I have nothing to lose do I?If you fell down a well and survived without a scratch and someone passed down a rope, would you make a loop and be hauled up or would you make a noose and hang yourself?

Dwise1,Most of science is correct, but it has wrong theories, wrong conclusions drawn from findings.In religion, there is confusion of truth and error mixed in, - a whole lot of superstitions and false doctrines.You jump from one band wagon to the other picking and choosing whatever contradicts to suit your argument. If you don't like love or God and you'd rather literally hang onto whatever gives you a thrill, then don't transfer your mental and emotional incompetence onto others, by insisting they are delusional.To say that all of science is always correct is a violation of its own reasoning anyway.Religions have their own dogmas, like a boat without a rudder.Science has nature as its reference book - I hope.
Religion should have the Bible as its reference book - I hope.Both have gone way off the rails in some of their interpretations.

If you had to pay for it, it would be a scam. And if you chose to pay, who's the fool then anyway?Education should be free don't you think?Religions definitely are the worst scams.