|
Author
|
Topic: Should we teach both evolution and religion in school?
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 735 of 2073 (743827)
12-05-2014 7:23 AM
|
Reply to: Message 711 by Colbard
11-28-2014 9:28 PM
|
|
Re: Belief in science instead of fantasy ...
Colbard writes: Do you have any evidence, logical evidence of course, for love? Do you expect people to do your homework for you? If you lack the ability to research the psychological correlates of "love" you should not be commenting about it.
Colbard writes: but it can also be seen as an active living principle upon which the creation of the universe is based. Only by people who are idiots. Love is an emotion. Open any undergrad psychology text book and look at the chapter on emotion: there is your science. Even Captain Kirk knew about this thing called "love". Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 711 by Colbard, posted 11-28-2014 9:28 PM | | Colbard has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 737 by Colbard, posted 12-05-2014 11:02 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
(2)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 758 of 2073 (744026)
12-07-2014 2:43 PM
|
Reply to: Message 745 by Colbard
12-07-2014 4:16 AM
|
|
Re: Nonsense is the word
I gave the story of the coin dating as a trigger to help the 'scientists' blow their steam off, giving them an opportunity to run me over with a bulldozer full of regular words. No, you got caught out in a lie. Now nobody trusts your integrity. What ever message you hoped to get across is always going to be tainted with knowledge that you are happy to lie to the people you are talking to.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 745 by Colbard, posted 12-07-2014 4:16 AM | | Colbard has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 760 by dwise1, posted 12-07-2014 3:22 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 759 of 2073 (744027)
12-07-2014 2:55 PM
|
Reply to: Message 747 by Colbard
12-07-2014 4:32 AM
|
|
Re: Pulling apart paragraphs
By the way, if you cannot measure love by your extremely short ruler, or put it into a test tube, does that mean it does not exist? You CAN measure love, you dimwit. Just like you can measure any emotion. You're selective attention is amazing.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 747 by Colbard, posted 12-07-2014 4:32 AM | | Colbard has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 786 of 2073 (744119)
12-08-2014 10:51 AM
|
Reply to: Message 767 by Colbard
12-08-2014 8:23 AM
|
|
Re: Nonsense is the word
Yeah, that was me. I got it wrong. My appologies for the confusion.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 767 by Colbard, posted 12-08-2014 8:23 AM | | Colbard has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
(2)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 815 of 2073 (744293)
12-09-2014 3:42 PM
|
Reply to: Message 800 by Colbard
12-09-2014 8:38 AM
|
|
Re: Carbon dating coins
So why not introduce the topic of dating with a holed story? Because that showed you to be a liar. An advocate of knowingly spreading false information to forwards his agenda. Is that the person you want to be? Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 800 by Colbard, posted 12-09-2014 8:38 AM | | Colbard has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 816 by RAZD, posted 12-09-2014 3:57 PM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 1839 of 2073 (879108)
07-11-2020 3:40 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1609 by dwise1
06-25-2020 1:42 PM
|
|
Re: More history...
quote:
I noticed that Dr Adequate was on that forum 13 years ago. And was somehow banned.
That may have been in the great purge that happened many years ago. Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1609 by dwise1, posted 06-25-2020 1:42 PM | | dwise1 has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 1846 of 2073 (879120)
07-11-2020 5:41 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1843 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 4:37 PM
|
|
Re: More history...
You’ve messed the quote up. That’s not me you are quoting. Easily done.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1843 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 4:37 PM | | Kleinman has replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 1860 of 2073 (879143)
07-12-2020 10:34 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1848 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 5:46 PM
|
|
Re: More history...
quote:
So you mean someone else by the name of Larni posted that quote?
Incorrect. The renowned and respected dwise1 posted what you claim I posted. To clarify: I was replying to his post about Dr Adequate. I quoted him in my post and then you attributed that to me (for reasons unknown). Like I said, easily done and not a problem.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1848 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 5:46 PM | | Kleinman has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2