Summations Only

What is it I have not sourced???My experience with Liberal progressive people educated in the humanities is that their mind is made up and their ego will defend that position in the face of facts and sources because they believe that nothing is so, so clear that their fogging of the issues can not confuse other readers.They will attack the messenger.
They will attack the sources.
They will facts with feeling they will generate concerning individual cases.
They will attack the motivations of the other side.
They will attack with accusations of racism, misogyny, and evil.They will also refuse to admit they were wrong, and gang together in a "democratic" ridicule full of anger and hatred for the person if the truth seems to be on his side.

Guns aren't the only tool for committing the crime of murder. You can be stabbed, strangled, or beat to death with a bludgeon as well, and a handgun is an appropriate tool in defending yourself against those attacks, as well.

The conversation stays on the gun as if it kills people, instead of comparing the 13% of Single Mothers in Britain who had illegitimate babies, and 60% of whom nevertheless work, with the sad situation in America where 35-40% of the Single Mothers do not work ...

...no, doc...In Britain, 25% of the families are heaed by Single mothers.
But these are mostly single women who have been divorced, 60% of them.Then, only half of the 25%, those single mothers, are on government subsidies.By CNN's Jack Cafferty
More than 100 million people in the United States of America get welfare from the federal government. 100 million out of 325 million.
According to the Weekly Standard, Senate Republicans say that the federal government administers nearly "80 different overlapping federal means-tested welfare programs."
This figure of 100 million people does not include those who only receive Social Security or Medicare
The most popular welfare programs are food stamps and Medicaid, with the number of recipients in both these programs skyrocketing in the last decade. Food stamp recipients alone jumped from 17 million in 2000 to 45 million in 2011.
And these 100 million people on welfare include citizens and non-citizens.
Page not found – Cafferty File - CNN.com BlogsContrasted to America, today, half the babies born are illegitimate, in spite we abort an equal number before birth.These illegitimate babies are supported by Welfare.

And what you mean by "poor baseline for comparison" is that all the countries you didn't include didn't have a homicide rate proportional to their incidence of gun ownership. A quality you roughly defined as "being Western-style."

So even if you use the worst number provided by people who are just as biased as me but in the opposite direction, gun use is a huge net positive. Or to put it another way, the Brady Center hates guns so much that they are totally cool with the population of a decent sized city getting raped and murdered every year as collateral damage in order to get what they want.

So disprove it. Try to remember that I've been to the UK a dozen times in the past two decades, all over the country, talked to citizens of Great Britain from all walks of life. How often do you visit the States? Try to remember that of our two countries, only one of them parks missile batteries on the tops of city apartment buildings and exposes its citizens to video surveillance any time they're outside of their homes - most of it privately owned and subject to no privacy protection whatsoever. Try to remember that stuff when you try to tell me that disarmed cops are worth not even being able to buy pepper spray, and that a disarmed people have nothing at all to fear from government intrusion into their lives.

Let me guess that you didn't bother to read any of the article beyond the quote I gave. The only drivel here is yours, as usual.

Not to mention that gun DEATHS are irrelevant anyway unless we know whether the person was the victim of a crime or the criminal being defended against. Also how many wrongful deaths by gun there are in relation to homicides by other means, also how many ATTEMPTED crimes were prevented by the potential victim's possession of a gun, which was the statistic I brought up earlier from Correia's blog post, whom Dr. A dismissed as a "halfwit" out of his abysmal immoral ignorance.

Wouldn't a high homicide rate negatively impact one's rating in the Human Development Index? (Answer - yes it would, by depressing life expectancy, which is a term in the HDI.)

I don't understand why you think there's justification for bracketing our sample around a specific range of "affluence" ...

So, you admit, it's just cherry-picking.

Now neither he nor I are genuinely comparing gun restrictions to the above hypothetical regarding cars.